Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:35:38.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—The Feeding Mechanism of the Cumacean Crustacean Diastylis bradyi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Ralph Dennell
Ralph Dennell
Affiliation:
Grisedale Research Student in the Department of Zoology, Victoria University, Manchester.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Cumacea and the Tanaidacea constitute branches from the line leading from some primitive Mysid and terminating in the Isopoda. This conclusion is founded on a consideration of purely morphological facts, and it is therefore of interest to study the feeding mechanisms of these groups in order to find out whether they show any possibility of having been derived from the type exhibited by the primitive Mysid (Cannon and Manton, 1927, and Manton, 1928).

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1934 , pp. 125 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Cannon, H. G., 1927. “On the Feeding Mechanism of Nebalia bipes,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lv, pp. 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1931. “Nebaliacea,” Discovery Reports, vol. iii, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1933. “On the Feeding Mechanism of the Branchiopoda,” Phil. Trans., B, vol. ccxxii, pp. 267–352.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., and Manton, S. M., 1927. “On the Feeding Mechanism of a Mysid Crustacean, Hemimysis Lamornœ,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lv, pp. 219–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, H. G., and Manton, S. M., 1929. “On the Feeding Mechanism of the Syncarid Crustacea,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvi, pp. 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennell, R., 1933. “The Habits and Feeding Mechanism of the Amphipod Haustorius arenarius Slabber,” Journ. Linn. Soc. Zool. London, vol. xxxviii, pp. 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, S. M., 1928. “On some Points in the Anatomy and Habits of the Lophogastrid Crustacea,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvi, pp. 103–119, pls. i–iii.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1900. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, vol. iii, Cumacea. Christiania.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T. R. R., 1913. Crustacea. Cumacea. (Sympoda.) Das Tierreich. 39 Lieferung. Berlin.Google Scholar