Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:46:10.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VISCUM SAHYADRICUM (VISCACEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM THE WESTERN GHATS OF INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

M. M. Sardesai ,
S. P. Gaikwad  and
S. R. Yadav
M. M. Sardesai*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind, Pune – 411 007, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: sardesaimm@gmail.com
S. P. Gaikwad
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Walchand College of Arts and Science, Walchand Hirachand Marg, Ashok Chowk, Solapur – 413 006, Maharashtra, India.
S. R. Yadav
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Vidyanagar, Kolhapur – 416 004, Maharashtra, India.
Get access

Abstract

Viscum sahyadricum (Santalaceae) from the Western Ghats of India is here described as a new species with description, illustrations and notes.

Keywords

EpiparasitemistletoeSantalalestaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , November 2019 , pp. 369 - 376
Copyright
© Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2019) 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, T. (1908). The Flora of the Presidency of Bombay, vol. 2, pp. 551–554. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Danser, B. H. (1941). The British-Indian species of Viscum revised and compared with those of South-Eastern Asia, Malaysia, and Australia. Blumea 4(2): 261–319.Google Scholar
Der, J. P. & Nickrent, D. L. (2008). A molecular phylogeny of Santalaceae (Santalales). Syst. Bot. 33(1): 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, C. E. C. (1926). Loranthaceae of Southern India and their host plants. Rec. Bot. Surv. India 11: 159–195.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. D. (1886). The Flora of British India, vol. 5, pp. 223–227. London: L. Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
Kirkup, D. W., Polhill, R. M. & Wiens, D. (2000). Viscum in context of its family, Viscaceae, and its diversity in Africa. In: Bussing, A. (ed.) Mistletoe: the Genus Viscum, pp. 7–29. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Kołodziejek, J., Patykowski, J. & Kołodziejek, R. (2013). Distribution, frequency and host patterns of European mistletoe (Viscum album subsp. album) in the major city of Lodz, Poland. Biologia 68(1): 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijt, J. (2016). Measurements and taxonomy in Arceuthobium (Viscaceae). Phytologia 98(3): 186–189.Google Scholar
Kuijt, J. & Hansen, B. (2015). Viscaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Volume XII, Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Santalales, Balanophorales, pp. 169–185. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Mabberley, D. J. (2017). Mabberley’s Plant-book, a Portable Dictionary of Plants, their Classification and Uses, 4th edition, pp. 1102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiasen, R. L. & Daugherty, C. M. (2009). Additional morphological measurements of Arceuthobium siskiyouense and A. monticola (Viscaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 3(2): 741–749.Google Scholar
Mathiasen, R. L. & Daugherty, C. M. (2013). Additional morphological measurements of Arceuthobium littorum and A. occidentale (Viscaceae). Phytologia 95(1): 70–78.Google Scholar
Mathiasen, R. L. & Kenaley, S. C. (2015a). A morphometric analysis of the dwarf mistletoes in the Arceuthobium campylopodum–occidentale complex (Viscaceae). Madroño 62(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiasen, R. L. & Kenaley, S. C. (2015b). A morphometric analysis of Arceuthobium campylopodum, A. laricis, and A. tsugense (Viscaceae). Phytologia 97(3): 200–218.Google Scholar
Mathiasen, R. L. & Kenaley, S. C. (2016). The classification of California Viscaceae: an alternative perspective. Madroño 63(1): 8–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maul, K., Krug, M., Nickrent, D. L., Müller, K. F., Quandt, D. & Wicke, S. (2019). Morphology, geographic distribution and host preference are poor predictors of phylogenetic relatedness in the mistletoe genus Viscum L. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 131: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrvarz, S. S., Shavvon, R. S. & Golmohammadi, N. (2012). Notes on the genus Viscum (Viscaceae) in Iran: a new combination based on morphological evidence. African J. Agric. Res. 7(11): 1694–1702.Google Scholar
Nickrent, D. L. (1997–). The Parasitic Plant Connection. Online. Available: http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu (accessed 28 February 2019).Google Scholar
Nickrent, D. L., Duff, R. J., Cowell, A. E., Wolfe, A. D., Young, N. D., Steiner, K. E. & dePamphilis, C. W. (1998). Molecular phylogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. In: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J. (eds) Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing, 2nd edition, pp. 211–241. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickrent, D. L., Malécot, V., Vidal-Russell, R. & Der, J. P. (2010). A revised classification of Santalales. Taxon 59(2): 538–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, G., Cuenca, A., Møller, I. M. & Seberg, O. (2015). Massive gene loss in mistletoe (Viscum, Viscaceae) mitochondria. Sci. Rep. 5: 17588 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
POWO (2019). Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Online. Available: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (retrieved 28 February 2019).Google Scholar
Rao, R. S. (1957). A revision of the Indo-Malayan species of Viscum Linn. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 36(2): 113–168.Google Scholar
Ross, C. M. & Sumner, M. J. (2005a). Early endosperm and embryo development of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum (Viscaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 166(6): 901–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. M. & Sumner, M. J. (2005b). Ultrastructure of the fertilized embryo sac in the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum (Viscaceae) and development of the caecum. Canad. J. Bot. 83(5): 459–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross Friedman, C. M. & Sumner, M. J. (2009). Maturation of the embryo, endosperm, and fruit of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum (Viscaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 170(3): 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadowski, E.-M., Seyfullah, L. J., Wilson, C. A., Calvin, C. L. & Schmidt, A. R. (2017). Diverse early dwarf mistletoes (Arceuthobium), ecological keystones of the Eocene Baltic amber biota. Amer. J. Bot. 4(5): 694–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanjai, V. N. & Balakrishnan, N. P. (2006). A revision of Indian Viscaceae. Rheedea 16(2): 73–109.Google Scholar
Sanjai, V. N. & Balakrishnan, N. P. (2012). Viscaceae. In: Balakrishnan, N. P., Chakrabarty, T., Sanjappa, M., Lakshminarasimhan, P. & Singh, P. (eds) Flora of India, Volume 23: Loranthaceae – Daphniphyllaceae, pp. 41–57. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.Google Scholar
Su, H.-J., Hu, J.-M., Anderson, F. E., Der, J. P. & Nickrent, D. L. (2015). Phylogenetic relationships of Santalales with insights into the origins of holoparasitic Balanophoraceae. Taxon 64(3): 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thriveni, M. C., Shivamurthy, G. R., Amrutesh, K. N., Vijay, C. R. & Sadanand, K. B. (2013). A new species of Viscum (Viscaceae) from Bandipur, Karnataka State, India. J. Syst. Evol. 51(2): 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar