Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T02:57:44.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aberrant ellipsis: advertisers do, but why?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Alan Garnham  and
Jane Oakhill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An account of recent theorizing about grammatical ellipsis, with examples of how advertisers have been bending the rules

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 37 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cornish, F. 1986. Anaphoric Relations in English and French: A Discourse Perspective. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I.A. 1976. ‘Deep and surface anaphora’, Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391–428.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.L. 1985. ‘Physiological explanations of deep and surface anaphora’, Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 785–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P.N. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Sag, I.A. and Hankamer, J. 1984. ‘Toward a theory of anaphoric processing’, Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 325–345.Google Scholar