No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Response to Bagavathiannan and Van Acker's“Transgenes and national boundaries – The needfor international regulations”: Biotechnology developers and regulators already consider transgene movement across national boundariesand the environmental risks posed by adventitious presence of unapproved events are overstated
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Bagavathiannan and Van Acker propose greater international cooperation and information sharing in risk assessment for biotechnology-derived crops because pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow across political boundaries may lead to the adventitious presence of unapproved transgenes at sites along the borders of neighboring countries. However, they fail to convince us that something is wrong with the current situation and provide no details of how it could be improved.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © ISBR, EDP Sciences, 2009
References
Ahrent, DK, Caviness, CE (1994) Natural cross-pollination of twelve soybean cultivars in Arkansas.
Crop Sci.
34: 376–378
CrossRef
Bagavathiannan M, Van Acker R (2009) Transgenes and national boundaries – The need for international regulation. Environ. Biosafety Res.
8, doi:10.1051/ebr/2009011
Ray, JD, Kilen, TC, Abel, CA, Paris, RL (2003) Soybean natural cross-pollination rates under field conditions.
Environ. Biosafety Res.
2: 133–138
CrossRef
Umbeck, PF, Barton, KA, Nordheim, EV, McCarty, JC, Parrott, WL, Jenkins, JE (1991) Degree of pollen dispersal by insects from a field test of genetically engineered cotton.
J. Econ. Entomol.
84: 1943–1950
CrossRef
Van Deynze, AE, Sundstrom, FJ, Bradford, KJ (2005) Pollen-meditated gene flow in California cotton depends on pollinator activity.
Crop Sci.
45: 1565–1570
CrossRef
You have
Access