Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:29:45.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the relative effectiveness of alternative conservation interventions in influencing stated behavioural intentions: the saiga antelope in Kalmykia (Russia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

CAROLINE HOWE ,
RUSLAN MEDZHIDOV  and
E. J. MILNER-GULLAND
CAROLINE HOWE*
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences and Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK
RUSLAN MEDZHIDOV
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecological Projects of the Republic of Kalmykia, Elista, Kalmykia, Russia
E. J. MILNER-GULLAND
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences and Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK
*
*Correspondence: Dr Caroline Howe Tel: + 44 7812 166 171 e-mail: c.howe.01@cantab.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Evaluating the relative effectiveness of different conservation interventions is difficult and rarely undertaken. Conservation of the critically endangered saiga antelope in the Republic of Kalmykia (Russia) provides a unique experimental set-up that was used to disentangle this issue. This study uses the amount pledged for conservation, adapted from contingent valuation methods, as a measure of behavioural intention to contribute to saiga conservation, to evaluate conservation effectiveness. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 250 individuals in eight villages exposed to traditional ‘fences-and-fines’ conservation, livelihoods enhancement (social engagement) or low-level media coverage. The intervention employed had a direct effect on amount pledged for saiga conservation. Social engagement programmes decreased protest-bidding behaviour but resulted in low amounts pledged for saiga conservation. Those exposed to media coverage pledged the greatest amounts on average, whilst those exposed to traditional conservation had both a high level of protest bidding and low pledges from those who pledged something. The primary reason given for protest bids was that the government or international community should pay for conservation. This may be a relic from the Soviet era, and may explain low pledges for conservation under social engagement. Ecological knowledge strongly affected amount pledged. The results were influenced by cultural and demographic factors, including residence time, exposure to saigas, age, wealth and knowledge regarding conservation. This study is unusual in disentangling the effect of a conservation intervention from other factors, and proposes using amount pledged for conservation as a practical tool for evaluating the effectiveness of projects aimed at increasing awareness and promoting positive behavioural intentions towards conservation. It provides support for media awareness-raising as a successful conservation intervention.

Keywords

awarenesseducationfences-and-finesindicatorsknowledgelivelihoodsmedia campaignprotected areasprotest bidsRussiasaiga antelope
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 37 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. & Rothengatter, T. (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25 (3): 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aipanjiguly, S., Jacobson, S. & Flamm, R. (2002) Conserving manatees: knowledge, attitudes and intentions of boaters in Tampa Bay, Florida. Conservation Biology 17 (4): 1098–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, I., Carson, R., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, R. & Sawnson, J. (2002) Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Ltd: 480 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, I. & Willis, K. (2001) Valuing Environmental Preferences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 692 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H. (2002) Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. CA, USA: Altamira Press: 800 pp.Google Scholar
Brooks, J., Franzen, M., Holmes, C., Grote, M. & Borgerhoff-Mulder, M. (2006) Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 20 (5): 1528–1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, T., Mulder, M. & Moove, M. (2003) Effects of conservation education on reasons to conserve biological diversity. Biological Conservation 114 (1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T., Pelkey, N. & Grigione, M. (1994) Effects of conservation biology education on attitudes towards nature. Conservation Biology 8 (3): 846–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M. (2007) The R Book. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd: 950 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. & Balmford, A. (2005) Momitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14 (11): 2507–2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfeld, D. (2000) War and peace and conservation biology. Conservation Biology 14 (1): 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. & Furby, L. (1988) Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special contingent valuation of visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 147–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley: 480 pp.Google Scholar
Foxall, G. (1984) Evidence for the attitudinal-behavioural consistency: implications for consumer research paradigms. Journal of Economic Psychology 5: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grin, F. (2000) Kalmykia: From Oblivion to Reassertion? Flensburg, Germany: European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI): 32 pp.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. (2003) The influence of protected area outreach on conservation attitudes and resource use patterns: a case study from Western Tanzania. Oryx 37 (3): 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughey, K., Cullen, R. & Moran, E. (2003) Integrating economies into priority setting and evaluation in conservation management. Conservation Biology 17 (1): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, J., Hay, R., Flux, I., Bradfield, P., Speed, H. & Jansen, P. (1999) Successful recovery of North Island kokako Callaeas (cinerea wilsoni) populations, by adaptive management. Biological Conservation 87: 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ite, U. (1996) Community perceptions of the Cross River National Park, Nigeria. Environmental Conservation 23 (4): 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S., McDuff, M. & Monroe, M. (2006) Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques. Oxford, UK: Oxford Biology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepson, P. (2004) Auditing conservation: reflections and findings from an independent audit of Asian elephant conservation. Loris 23: 29–33.Google Scholar
Kirikov, S. (1983) Chelorek i priroda stepnoi zony, konets X-svedina XIX v. (Evropeiskaya chast’ SSSR) [Humans and nature of the steppe zone, late 10th - mid-19th centuries (European part of USSR)]. Moscow, Russia: Nanka.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. (1995) Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioural Sciences. CA, USA: Brooks/Cole: 944 pp.Google Scholar
Kühl, A., Balinova, N., Bykova, E., Esipov, A., Arylov, I. A., Lushchekina, A. & Milner-Gulland, E. (2009) The role of saiga poaching in rural communities: linkages between attitudes, socio-economic circumstances and behaviour. Biological Conservation 142 (7): 1442–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luiselli, J. (2006) Antecedent Intervention: Recent Development in Community Focused Behaviour Support. MD, USA: Brookes Publishing Co.: 640 pp.Google Scholar
Lushchekina, A. & Struchkov, A. (2001) The saiga antelope in Europe: once again on the brink? The Open Country 3: 11–24.Google Scholar
Luzar, E. & Cosse, K. (1998) Willingness to pay or intention to pay: the attitude-behaviour relationship in contingent valuation. Journal of Socio-Economics 27 (3): 427–444.Google Scholar
Mace, G., Balmford, A., Leader-Williams, N., Manica, A., Walter, O., West, C. & Zimmermann, A. (2007) Measuring conservation success: assessing zoos’ contribution. In: Zoos in the 21st Century: Catalysts for Conservation?, ed. Zimmermann, A., Hatchwell, M., Dickie, L. & West, C., pp. 322–342. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, J. & Heinen, J. (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favourable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28 (2): 165–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner-Gulland, E., Kholodova, M., Bekenov, A., Buhreeva, O., Grachev, I. A., Amgalan, L. & Lushchekina, A. (2001) Dramatic decline in saiga antelope populations. Oryx 35 (4): 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. & Carson, R. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C., USA: The John Hopkins University Press: 488 pp.Google Scholar
Newmark, W., Leonard, N., Sariko, H. & Gamassa, D. (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63 (2): 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, P. & Korsching, P. (1983) Social and institutional factors affecting adoption and maintenance of agricultural BMPs. In: Agricultural Management and Water Quality, ed. Schaller, F. & Bailey, G., pp. 349–373. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Paradiso, M. & Trisorio, A. (2001) The effect of knowledge on the disparity between hypothetical and real willingness-to-pay. Applied Economics 33 (11): 1359–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salafsky, N. & Margoluis, R. (1999) Threat reduction assessment: a practical and cost effective approach to evaluating conservation and development projects. Conservation Biology 13: 830–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saterson, K., Christensen, N., Jackson, R., Kramer, R., Pimm, S., Smith, M. & Wiener, J. (2004) Disconnects in evaluating the relative effectiveness of conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 18: 597–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, V. & Zhirnov, L. (1998) The Saiga: Phylogeny, Systematics, Ecology, Conservation and Use. Moscow, Russia: PUBLISHER.Google Scholar
Spash, C. (2000) Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: empirical evidence form social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9 (4): 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, M., Pullin, A., Dolman, P. & Knight, T. (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 305–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, E., Klausmeyer, K., Morrison, S., Bode, M. & Shaw, M. (2009) Evaluating conservation spending for species return: a retrospective analysis in California. Conservation Letters 20 (3): 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNDP (2007) National Human Development Report: Russian Federation 2006/2007. Russias's Regions: Goals, Challenges, Achievements. Moscow, Russia: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNEP (2006) Report on the Eighth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.Google Scholar
Whitebread, E., Obgenova, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. (2008) Evaluating the potential for participatory monitoring in Kalmykia. Saiga News 8: 12–13.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Howe Supplementary Material

Howe Supplementary Appendix

Download Howe Supplementary Material(File)
File 5.3 MB