Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:58:25.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergenerational and Intragenerational Equity Requirements for Sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Igor Vojnovic
Igor Vojnovic
Affiliation:
37 Appian Drive, Willowdale, Ontario M2J 2P8, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Due to the existence of entropy, exhaustible resources, and resource scarcity, the condition of sustainability as currently conceived seems unlikely ever to be achieved. Nevertheless, Humankind can ensure advancement towards ecologically sustainable development, thereby prolonging the existence of social and ecological stability, by encouraging the proposed inter generational and intra generational equity requirements. The intra generational condition of ensuring equitable access to resources within the current generation will be likely to be a prerequisite to achieving successfully the other equity requirements. A limited time-frame — in which any one generation would only be responsible for meeting the needs of the current generation, and passing to the next generation the resource stocks that they themselves had inherited, or more if possible — has also been proposed to make the pursuit of sustainability a more concrete task, and one that should be more manageable from a policy perspective.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 223 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumol, W. & Oates, W. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: x + 299 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commoner, B. (1971). The Closing Circle. Alfred A. Knopf Inc., New York, NY, USA: 326 pp.Google Scholar
Daly, H. & Cobb, J. (1990). For the Common Good. Green Print, London, England, UK: viii + 482 pp.Google Scholar
Dovers, S. (1990). Sustainability in context: an Australian perspective. Environmental Management, 14(3), pp. 297–305, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkin, T. & McLaren, D. (1991). Reviving the City: Towards Sustainable Urban Development. Friends of the Earth, London, England, UK: ix + 277 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. (1989). Decision making for sustainable development: selected approaches to environmental assessment and management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 9, pp. 337–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, J.E. (1987). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xiii + 157 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment and Society. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: ix + 286 pp.Google Scholar
Page, T. (1977). Conservation and Economic Efficiency. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xvii + 266 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. & Turner, K. (1991). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xiii + 378 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Pearce, D., Markandya, A. & Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan, London, England, UK: xvi + 192 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. & Burnett, Sir J. (1993). Surviving With The Biosphere: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Environmental Future (4th ICEF), held in Budapest, Hungary, during 22–27 April 1990. Edinburgh University Press, 22 George Square, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: xxii + 572 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. & Worthington, E.B. (1990). On the use and misuse of the term ‘ecosystem’. Environmental Conservation, 17(3), p. 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W. & Bailey, S. (1989). Defining Sustainable Development. UBC Centre for Human Settlements, Vancouver, Canada: 12 pp.Google Scholar
Rees, W. & Roseland, M. (1991). Sustainable communities: planning for the 21st Century. Plan Canada, 31(3), pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Roseland, M. (1992). Toward Sustainable Communities. National Round Table on the Enviromnent and the Economy, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: xii + 340 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront (1992). Regeneration. Minister of Supply and Services of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: xxii + 530 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Stren, R., White, R. & Whitney, J. (1992). Sustainable Cities: Urbanization and the Environment in International Perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA: viii + 365 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Tolba, M.K. (1990). Building an environmental institutional framework for the future. Environmental Conservation, 17(2), pp. 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development lsqb;cited as WCED] (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xv + 400 pp.Google Scholar