Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:27:45.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evaluation of fabrics in relation to their use as protective garments in nursing and surgery. II. Dispersal of skin organisms in a test chamber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

O. M. Lidwell
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
C. A. Mackintosh
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
A. G. Towers
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effectiveness of a representative range of fabrics in restricting dispersal through them of dry skin-borne bacteria has been examined. The fabrics were tested made up into trousers which were worn by volunteers during standardized exercise in a test chamber operated within a unidirectional flow clean-air room. Under these conditions, with careful attention to sealing at ankles and waist, it was possible to estimate penetration as low as 0·3%. Penetrations as low as 1% were observed with some synthetic fabrics. These had a relatively high surface resistivity and developed significant electrostatic charges.

When the observed values for penetration were compared with the results of a series of measurements and tests made on the fabrics it was clear that the correlation between these values and the other results was in every case very close for all the five woven cotton or cotton terylene fabrics but that no measurement or test was capable of predicting the behaviour of all the other materials in dispersal experiments. The inherent variability of dispersal experiments seems to be very great. With a standard deviation of the approximately log-normal distribution of the experimental values as high as about 2 times the mean, it is necessary to carry out as many as 20 replicate experiments in order to differentiate with certainty between garments with a two-fold difference in penetration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Bernard, H. R., Speers, R., O'Grady, F. & Shooter, R. A. (1965). Reduction of dissemination of skin bacteria by modification of operating-room clothing and by ultraviolet irradiation. Lancet ii, 458.Google Scholar
Blowers, R. & McCluskey, M. (1965). Design of operating room dress for surgeons. Lancet ii, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Thomas, J. C. (1941). A slit sampler for collecting and counting air-borne bacteria. Journal of Hygiene 41, 197.Google Scholar
Duguid, J. P. & Wallace, A. T. (1948). Air infection with dust liberated from clothing. Lancet ii, 845.Google Scholar
Hambraeus, A. (1973). Transfer of Staphylococcus aureus via nurses' uniforms. Journal of Hygiene 71, 799.Google Scholar
Hambraeus, A. & Ransjö, U. (1977). Attempts to control clothes-borne infection in a burns unit. I. Experimental investigations of some clothes for barrier nursing. Journal of Hygiene 79, 193.Google Scholar
Lees, J. & Brighton, W. D. (1972). Simulated human skin scales. Journal of Hygiene 70, 557.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O. M. & Mackintosh, C. A. (1978). The evaluation of fabrics in relation to their use as protective garments in nursing and surgery. I. Physical measurements and bench tests. Journal of Hygiene 81, 433.Google Scholar
Lidwell, O. M., Towers, A. G., Ballard, J. & Gladstone, B. (1974). Transfer of microorganisms between nurses and patients in a clean air environment. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 37, 649.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, C. A., Lidwell, O. M., Towers, A. G. & Marples, R. R. (1978). The dimensions of skin fragments dispersed into the air during activity. Journal of Hygiene 81, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W., Vesley, D. & Hodgson, R. (1976). Bacterial dispersion in relation to operating room clothing. Journal of Hygiene 76, 367.Google Scholar