Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:36:49.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic characterisation of Measles virus variants identified during a large epidemic in Milan, Italy, March–December 2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2019

S. Bianchi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
E.R. Frati
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
A. Lai
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ‘Luigi Sacco’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
D. Colzani
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
G. Ciceri
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
M. Baggieri
Affiliation:
National Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
A. Lamberti
Affiliation:
Health Protection Agency, Metropolitan Area of Milan, Milan, Italy
S. Senatore
Affiliation:
Health Protection Agency, Metropolitan Area of Milan, Milan, Italy DG Salute, UO Governo della prevenzione e tutela sanitaria, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
M. Faccini
Affiliation:
Health Protection Agency, Metropolitan Area of Milan, Milan, Italy
F. Mazzilli
Affiliation:
National Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
M. Gramegna
Affiliation:
DG Salute, UO Governo della prevenzione e tutela sanitaria, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
G. Zehender
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ‘Luigi Sacco’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Coordinated Research Center ‘EpiSoMI’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
F. Magurano
Affiliation:
National Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy
E. Tanzi
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Coordinated Research Center ‘EpiSoMI’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
A. Amendola
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy Coordinated Research Center ‘EpiSoMI’, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Silvia Bianchi, E-mail: silvia.bainchi@unimi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2017, Italy experienced a large measles epidemic with 5408 cases and four deaths. As Subnational Reference Laboratory of the Measles and Rubella surveillance NETwork (MoRoNET), the EpiSoMI (Epidemiology and Molecular Surveillance of Infections) Laboratory (University of Milan) set up rapid and active surveillance for the complete characterisation of the Measles virus (Mv) responsible for the large measles outbreak in Milan and surrounding areas (Lombardy, Northern Italy). The aims of this study were to describe the genetic profile of circulating viruses and to track the pathway of measles transmission. Molecular analysis was performed by sequencing the highly variable 450 nucleotides region of the N gene (N-450) of Mv genome. Two-hundred and ninety-nine strains of Mv were analysed. The phylogenetic analysis showed five different variants, two not previously described in the studied area, belonging to D8 and B3 genotypes. Three events of continuous transmission of autochthonous variants (D8-Osaka, D8-London and B3-Milan variants) and two events of continuous transmission of imported variants (B3-Dublin and D8-Hulu Langat) tracked five different transmission pathways. These pathways outlined two epidemic peaks: the first in April and the second in July 2017. The correlation between Mv variant and the epidemiological data may enable us to identify the sources of virus importation and recognise long-lasting virus transmission pathways.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) planned to eliminate measles by 2015, but due to the numerous measles outbreak in the European Region in the last few years this did not occur [1] and consequently the WHO postponed the target date for the global eradication of measles to 2020 [2, 3]. Measles elimination depends mainly on achieving high vaccination coverage, closing immunity gaps and ensuring high-quality, case-based surveillance [4], which are the main goals of the European Region as outlined in the European Vaccine Action Plan 2015–2020 [5].

The process of verification of elimination will be based on documented evidence of the interruption of endemic measles transmission at national level [5]. Endemic transmission is defined as continuous transmission of an indigenous or imported Measles virus (Mv) for a period of 12 months or more in a defined geographical area. Measles is deemed to be eliminated when no endemic cases have been documented for a period of at least 12 months by a well-performing surveillance system [4].

Mv is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Paramyxoviridae family, genus Morbillivirus. Sequencing of a 450 nt long fragment coding for the carboxyl-terminus of the Nucleoprotein (N-450) is currently recommended by the WHO for genotyping of Mv, since it provides the highest density of variable nucleotides within a relatively small sequence fragment [Reference Rota6]. The molecular characterisation of virus strains is essential for monitoring Mv transmission and the progress of elimination efforts [Reference Orenstein7]. The WHO recognises 24 genotypes of Mv [Reference Rota6, 8] and there are four predominant measles genotypes currently circulating worldwide: D8, B3, H1 and D4 [9]. Within genotypes, variants are defined as groups of viruses with identical or nearly identical N-450 sequence. Moreover, WHO refers to ‘named’ strains when identical strains are identified due to their prevalence within MeaNS (Measles Nucleotide Surveillance) database [Reference Rota6].

The correlation between genetic and epidemiological data may enable us to identify the sources of virus importation and recognise long-lasting virus transmission pathways.

In 2017, Italy experienced a large measles epidemic with 5408 cases and four deaths [Reference Beaty and Benhur10, 11]. Most cases occurred in Piedmont and Lombardy (Northern Italy), Tuscany, Lazio and Abruzzo (Central Italy) and Sicily (Southern Italy) and were older than 15 years (median age: 27 years). Overall, 88% of measles cases were not vaccinated, and 44% were hospitalised. Seventy-nine per cent of the cases were laboratory confirmed [11, 12]. From March 2017, as one of the two Subnational Reference Laboratories of the Measles and Rubella surveillance NETwork (MoRoNET) [13] in the Lombardy Region, EpiSoMI Laboratory set up rapid and active surveillance for the complete characterisation of the Mv virus responsible for the large measles outbreak in Milan and surrounding areas (Lombardy, Italy), which is a highly populated area with nearly 4 million inhabitants. From 1 March to 31 December 2017, 321 measles cases were laboratory-confirmed, 162 were sporadic cases and 159 were related to 75 outbreaks. The phylogenetic analysis enables us to establish whether links exist between concurrent measles cases. The aims of this study were to describe the genetic profile of circulating viruses and to track the pathway of measles transmission.

Methods

Mv amplification and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from urine and oral fluid using the NucliSENS® easyMAG™ automated platform (bioMérieux bv, Lyon, France) according to the off-board lysis protocol. The amplification of a highly variable 450 nt sequence encoding the C-terminal part of the N gene (N-450) was performed [Reference Rota6, 8]. Reverse transcription with Random Hexamer Primer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) using M-MLV RT Reverse transcriptase kit protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was performed. The N-450 fragment was amplified by semi-nested PCR using an equimolar mixture of Mv-specific primers with the Go Taq® DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). In the first step MN-F1 (5′-CCTGCTCTTGGACTGCATGAA-3′, nt. 951–971 of Mv strain Edmonston (Zagreb vaccine, Accession Number: AF266290.1)) and MV-B1 (5′-AACAATGATGGAGGGTAGGCG-3′, nt. 1629–1609) primers amplified a region of 678 bp, while the second step amplified a fragment of 644 bp selected by MV-F1 (5′-TACCCTCTGCTCTGGAGCTATGCC-3′, nt. 985–1008) and MV-B1 primers [Reference Chibo14]. The first step was carried out under the following amplification reaction conditions: 5 min denaturation at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of amplification. Each cycle consisted in a denaturation step at 94 °C for 30 s, an annealing step at 56 °C for 30 s and an elongation step at 72 °C for 45 s. The last cycle was followed by a 7 min elongation step at 72 °C. The second step involved 5 min denaturation at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of amplification consisting in a denaturation step at 94 °C for 30 s, an annealing step at 60 °C for 30 s and an elongation step at 72 °C for 45 s. The last cycle was followed by a 7 min elongation step at 72 °C.

RT-PCR products were purified with the NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-Up (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) and nucleotide sequences were obtained by automated DNA sequencing based on fluorescent dye terminator on genetic analyser ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystem, Thermo Fisher, USA).

Phylogenetic analysis

N-450 nucleotide sequences were analysed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool-nucleotide (BLAST-n) in order to identify similarities with previously reported strains [15].

Virus genotypes were designated according to the official WHO nomenclature and the sequences were submitted to the MeaNS database [8, 9].

Genotype as well as variant assignments were based on a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. The Mv genotype A strain ‘MVs/Vaccine/Edmonston/’ was used as an outgroup.

Nucleotide sequences were aligned using Clustal X [Reference Larkin16] and if necessary the alignments were manually edited using BioEDIT software [17]. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree was constructed with the best-fitting substitution model (Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano, HKY) chosen by JModelTest v. 2.1.7 [Reference Posada18] (http://darwin.uvigo.es/software/jmodeltest.html) using MrBayes [Reference Huelsenbeck and Ronquist19]. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search was carried out for 5 × 106 generations using tree sampling every 100th generation and a burn-in fraction of 50%. Statistical support for specific clades was obtained by calculating the posterior probability (pp) of each monophyletic clade, and a posterior consensus tree was generated after a 50% burn-in. The tree was visualised and edited using Figtree software v 1.4.1.

Classification of epidemic events

Descriptive data on measles cases were obtained from the Lombardy Region database. According to the national surveillance guidelines, the Lombardy Region Surveillance System requires physicians to report all suspected measles cases to the Local Health Units (LHUs) within 12 h from the onset of symptoms. The LHUs are responsible for carrying out all epidemiological investigations and collecting specimens from each suspected case. The personal data, clinical details and epidemiological status of each notified case were systematically reported to the Lombardy Region database. The data obtained were used to distinguish between sporadic cases or outbreaks and between indigenous, imported or imported-related cases.

We matched the epidemiological data with the genetic profile of the strains and the following definitions were used to classify the epidemic events:

Transmission pathways, events involving the continuous transmission of the same virus variant (autochthonous or imported) in a selected geographic area in a limited period;

Autochthonous variant, group of viruses with identical or nearly identical N-450 nucleotide sequences present in a selected geographic area and identified in non-imported cases;

Imported variant, group of viruses with identical or nearly identical N-450 nucleotide sequences previously not identified in a selected geographic area and identified in imported or import-related cases.

Results

Genotyping and phylogenetic analyses

Two-hundred and ninety-nine out of 321 (93.1%) confirmed cases (163 were classified as sporadic and 159 clustered in 75 different outbreaks) were successfully genotyped by sequencing the N-450 region. The BLAST-n analysis revealed that the sequences belonged to genotypes D8 and B3. The most frequently detected genotype was D8 (248/299, 82.9%).

The phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1) showed that 242 D8 sequences belonged to three WHO named strains: Osaka (Mv/Osaka.JPN/29.15, N = 146), London (Mvs/London.GBR/21.16/2, N = 94), Hulu Langat (MVi/Hulu-Langat.MYS/26.11, N = 2). For the remaining six sequences, five were closely related to the named strain Osaka and one to the named strain Hulu Langat.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the Mv-sequences identified in Lombardy during 2017. The evolutionary history of 299 N-450 Italian sequences was inferred with MrBayes software using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method and Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano (HKY) model. Posterior probabilities of clades are indicated next to the nodes. The WHO named strains related to Italian sequences are coloured (red for B3, blue for D8). Genotypes and novel variant are indicated by squared parenthesis. All sequences presenting 100% identity and obtained from the same city or geographical area were considered as one single sequence which report in the label the number of total strains.

D8 sequences belonging to the named strain Osaka and those related to this named strain, grouped significantly into a main variant D8-Osaka (pp = 0.91) (similarity range: 99.8–100%). Moreover, the D8-London is a named strain firstly identified in London in May 2016 (Mvs/London.GBR/21.16/2) and then observed for the first time in Milan in May 2017 (MVs/Milan.ITA/22.17/2, pp = 0.94). D8 sequences belonging to the named strain Hulu Langat and that related to this named strain, grouped significantly outside the variant D8-Osaka (pp = 1) (similarity range: 99.8–100%).

The 51 B3 sequences were closely related (pp = 0.93): 45 belonged to the WHO named strain Dublin (MVs/Dublin.IRL/8.16) and one was closely related to it (similarity: 99.8%). The remaining five sequences, temporarily called B3-Milan variant (MVs/Milan.ITA/35.17), grouped significantly (pp = 0.94) and were identical to each other.

Pathways of transmission

Three events of continuous transmission of autochthonous variants (D8-Osaka, D8-London and B3-Milan variants) and two events of continuous transmission of imported variants (B3-Dublin and D8-Hulu Langat) tracked five different transmission pathways. These pathways defined two epidemic peaks: the first in April and the second in July 2017 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Epidemic curves of five different pathways of transmission sustained by five different variants from March to December 2017, in the surrounding areas and in the city of Milan.

The D8-Osaka variant

The D8-Osaka was the prevalent variant identified in 146 autochthonous cases. In particular, 58 were notified as sporadic cases while 88 were involved in 47 outbreaks.

Events of continuous transmission of D8-Osaka were observed from March (MVs/Milan.ITA/09.17) to November (MVs/MonzaBrianza.ITA/47.17) 2017. Initially, the variant spread within the community and later spread in hospital settings. In March 2017, a serious outbreak affected three family members causing the death of one of them. The D8-Osaka was isolated from the biological samples of one of these cases. In June 2017, the same variant infected a transplant patient who developed late neurological sequelae and died in January 2018.

D8-London named strain

This previously undetected variant was identified in 94 autochthonous cases, 59 were notified as sporadic cases and 35 were related to 20 outbreaks. Events involving the continuous transmission of this strain were detected from June (MVs/Milan.ITA/22.17/2) to October (MVs/MonzaBrianza.ITA/41.17) 2017. The named strain was mainly spread in hospital settings.

B3-Dublin named strain

This strain was detected in 45 cases, 27 were notified as sporadic cases while 18 cases were related to nine outbreaks. Five cases out of 45 were imported, one case was imported-related and 39 cases were autochthonous.

The B3-Dublin was imported during March/April 2017 from various European countries (France, Romania) and Italian Regions (Apulia, Lazio, Piedmont), and successively caused imported-related outbreaks and then became established in the area, causing autochthonous cases. Events of continuous transmission of this variant peaked in July 2017, due to several nosocomial outbreaks. The last identification of the B3-Dublin was in September 2017 (MVs/Milan.ITA/36.17/3).

D8-Hulu-Langat variant

This variant was detected in two sporadic cases, of which one was notified as imported. The D8-Hulu-Langat strain was imported from South Africa in September 2017 (MVs/Como.ITA/38.17); in October 2017 this variant was detected in one case (MVs/MonzaBrianza.ITA/41.17/2) that was not epidemiologically travel-associated since the source of infection remains unknown.

B3-Milan variant

This previously undetected variant (MVs/Milan.ITA/35.17) was identified in five autochthonous cases, three cases were involved in a family outbreak and two sporadic cases. This variant was only observed in September 2017.

Conclusions

A large measles epidemic occurred in Milan in 2017. In this study, we reconstructed the transmission pathways by matching the genetic profile of circulating Mv strains with epidemiological data.

Two different genotypes were identified: D8 and B3. The time of arrival of the D8 genotype in the area under study was estimated and dates back to March 1987 [Reference Amendola20], while the B3 genotype was detected for the first time in Italy in the years 2006–2007 [Reference Magurano21].

The phylogenetic analysis identified five different clusters: three belonging to the D8 genotype (D8-Osaka variant, D8-London named strain and D8-Hulu Langat variant) and two of the B3 genotype (B3-Dublin named strain and B3-Milan variant).

Two epidemic peaks were observed in April and July 2017. The first peak was mainly caused by the autochthonous D8-Osaka named strain. This named strain was described for the first time in Osaka, Japan in 2015 and was detected in Europe from 2016 onwards (in Germany, the Netherland and Switzerland). At the beginning of 2017, the D8-Osaka named strain was identified in several Italian Regions (Lazio, Piedmont, Emilia Romagna, Tuscany and Lombardy). It was the most prevalent in Milan and the surrounding areas and caused severe clinical courses and deaths. Several D8-Osaka cases were notified as sporadic cases, however the genetic profile suggested that it was a single large outbreak.

The second epidemic peak was characterised by the co-circulation of two different variants, the D8-London and the B3-Dublin named strain. The D8-London caused the highest number of cases, all were autochthonous cases. This named strain, which is phylogenetically related to the D8-Osaka variant, was observed for the first time in Milan in May 2017. A few weeks later, it caused an epidemic event in Finland where it was imported by an Italian student [Reference Seppälä22]. The D8-London named strain has caused events of long-lasting continuous transmission (June–September 2017) in Milan where it was disproportionally amplified by five nosocomial outbreaks.

The B3-Dublin caused the important outbreak in Romania in 2016–2017. In 2017, this named strain spread across all of the European countries [23]. In Milan, multiple introductions of this named strain were observed from March 2017 when it became established in the area thus replacing the B3-Como named strain which had circulated in Northern Italy from August 2015 onwards [Reference Filia24]. At the time of writing there is an ongoing measles outbreak of the B3-Dublin in the study area and this strain is considered to be endemic (persisting for more than 12 months [4]).

The genetic identification of circulating viruses enabled us to highlight the simultaneous occurrence of three different outbreaks caused by three variants (autochthonous or imported) in Milan and the surrounding area.

It is important to note that the D8-Osaka, D8-London and B3-Dublin named strains were associated with 12 nosocomial outbreaks which probably facilitated virus spread and the amplification of the virus in the community setting [Reference Botelho-Nevers25, Reference Sydnor and Perl26]. The genetic analysis of the N-450 is a useful tool for establishing whether connections exist between concurrent measles cases [Reference Hiebert and Severini27].

Genotyping, phylogenetic analysis and the study of the epidemic curves could be considered important tools to follow the progress towards elimination. In fact, this multiple approach enables us to track the introduction of imported strains, to observe their persistence in a defined geographic area and highlight the occurrence of large epidemics and their periodic patterns.

Author ORCIDs

S. Bianchi, 0000-0002-1365-9408; D. Colzani, 0000-0002-4079-1957.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank: all the staffs of Local Health Care Agencies involved in outbreaks investigation; the General Directorate of Welfare of Lombardy Region, in particular Danilo Cereda and Marco Mentasti, for their help in retrieving the epidemiological data; Paola Bucci e Antonella Marchi of the Department of Infectious Diseases (ISS) for their support.

Financial support

This work was supported by funds from Lombardy Region.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

1.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2018) Risk of measles transmission in the EU/EEA, 21 March 2018. Stockholm, ECDC. Available at https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/Measles-rapid-risk-assessment-European-Union-countries.pdf (Accessed 16 June 2018).Google Scholar
2.World Health Organization (2012) Global Measles and Rubella Strategic Plan: 2012–2020. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44855/1/9789241503396_eng.pdf (Accessed 10 June 2018).Google Scholar
3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2018) Monthly measles and rubella monitoring report, July 2018. Stockholm: ECDC. Available at https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/Monthly-Measles-Rubella-monitoring-report-July-2018-1.pdf (Accessed 17 July 2018).Google Scholar
4.World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2014) Eliminating measles and rubella. Framework for the verification process in the WHO European Region. WHO. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/247356/Eliminating-measles-and-rubella-Framework-for-the-verification-process-in-the-WHO-European-Region.pdf (Accessed 24 June 2018).Google Scholar
5.World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2014) European Vaccine Action Plan 2015–2020. Copenhagen: WHO. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/vaccines-and-immunization/publications/2014/european-vaccine-action-plan-20152020-2014 (Accessed 16 June 2018).Google Scholar
6.Rota, PA et al. (2011) Global distribution of measles genotypes and measles molecular epidemiology. Journal of Infectious Disease 204, S514S523.Google Scholar
7.Orenstein, WA et al. (2018) Measles and Rubella global strategic plan 2012–2020 midterm review. Vaccine 36, A1A34.Google Scholar
8.World Health Organization (2012) Measles virus nomenclature update: 2012. The Weekly Epidemiological Record 87, 7381.Google Scholar
9.Measles Nucleotide Surveillance database (MeaNS). Available at www.who-measles.org (Accessed 16 July 2018).Google Scholar
10.Beaty, SM and Benhur, L (2016) Constraints on the genetic and antigenic variability of measles virus. Viruses 8, 109.Google Scholar
11.Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Institute of Health, Rome) (2018) Epicentro: Morbillo e Rosolia News (Number 37, January 2018). National Integrated Measles-Rubella Surveillance System. Available at http://www.epicentro.iss.it/problemi/morbillo/bollettino/RM_News_2018_37%20def.pdf (Accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar
12.Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Institute of Health, Rome) (2018) Epicentro: Morbillo e Rosolia News (Number 41, May 2018). National Integrated Measles-Rubella Surveillance System. http://www.epicentro.iss.it/problemi/morbillo/bollettino/RM_News_2018_41.pdf (Accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar
13.MoRoNET, Morbillo e Rosolia Network. Available at https://moronetlab.it/ (Accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar
14.Chibo, D et al. (2000) Molecular characterization of measles viruses isolated in Victoria, Australia, between 1973 and 1998. Journal of General Virology 81, 25112518.Google Scholar
15.Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST-n). Available at http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (Accessed 13 April 2018).Google Scholar
16.Larkin, MA et al. (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23, 29472948.Google Scholar
17.Bioedit software v7.2.5. Available at http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html (Accessed 13 April 2018).Google Scholar
18.Posada, D (2008) Jmodeltest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 12531256.Google Scholar
19.Huelsenbeck, JP and Ronquist, F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17, 754755.Google Scholar
20.Amendola, A et al. (2017) Measles re-emergence in Northern Italy: pathways of measles virus genotype D8, 2013–2014. Infection Genetics and Evolution 48, 120126.Google Scholar
21.Magurano, F et al. (2012) Molecular epidemiology of measles virus in Italy, 2002–2007. Virology Journal 9, 284.Google Scholar
22.Seppälä, E et al. (2017) A cluster of measles linked to an imported case, Finland, 2017. Euro Surveillance 22, pii: 30595.Google Scholar
23.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (2017) Epidemiological update: Measles – monitoring European outbreaks, 7 July 2017. ECDC. Available at https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/epidemiological-update-measles-monitoring-european-outbreaks-7-july-2017 (Accessed 19 May 2018).Google Scholar
24.Filia, A et al. (2016) Outbreak of a new measles B3 variant in the Roma/Sinti population with transmission in the nosocomial setting, Italy, November 2015 to April 2016. Euro Surveillance 21, pii: 30235.Google Scholar
25.Botelho-Nevers, E et al. (2012) Nosocomial transmission of measles: an updated review. Vaccine 30, 39964001.Google Scholar
26.Sydnor, E and Perl, TM (2014) Healthcare providers as sources of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccine 32, 48144822.Google Scholar
27.Hiebert, J and Severini, A (2014) Measles molecular epidemiology: what does it tell us and why is it important? Canada Communicable Disease Report 40, 257260.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the Mv-sequences identified in Lombardy during 2017. The evolutionary history of 299 N-450 Italian sequences was inferred with MrBayes software using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method and Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano (HKY) model. Posterior probabilities of clades are indicated next to the nodes. The WHO named strains related to Italian sequences are coloured (red for B3, blue for D8). Genotypes and novel variant are indicated by squared parenthesis. All sequences presenting 100% identity and obtained from the same city or geographical area were considered as one single sequence which report in the label the number of total strains.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Epidemic curves of five different pathways of transmission sustained by five different variants from March to December 2017, in the surrounding areas and in the city of Milan.