Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:55:07.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Bacillus coli Infections of the Urinary Tract, Especially in Relation to Haemolytic Organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Leonard S. Dudgeon ,
Eric Wordley  and
F. Bawtree
Leonard S. Dudgeon
Affiliation:
Professor of Pathology in the University of London. Director of Pathology, St Thomas's Hospital;
Eric Wordley
Affiliation:
Assistant Bacteriologist, St Thomas's Hospital;
F. Bawtree
Affiliation:
Research Worker in Pathology, St Thomas's Hospital.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Those who have studied the literature of Bacillus coli infections of the urinary tract, over a period of many years, must be fully conscious that the methods employed in such investigations have been on very similar lines. Bacilli isolated from the urine have been classified on the result of various cultural reactions of which the fermentation of cane sugar anddulcitol appears to occupy the most important position. Animals have been inoculated with various strains of urinary coli, while similar inoculation experiments have been made on animals before and after a mechanical injury to one or both kidneys had been produced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1921 , pp. 137 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

References

REFERENCES

Box, C. R. (1910). Discussion on Infections of the Urinary Tract of Bacillus coli in Infancy and Childhood. Brit. Med. Journ. II. 1128.Google Scholar
Brewer, G. E. (1906). Some observations upon acute unilateral septic infarcts of the kidney. Surg. Gynaecol. Obst. II. 485.Google Scholar
Brewer, G. E. (1911). The present state of our knowledge of acute Renal Infections. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. LVII. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, H. and Crabtree, G. E. (1916). Aetiology and Pathology of non-Tuberculosis Renal Infections. Surg. Gynaecol. Obst. XXIII. 495.Google Scholar
Dreyer, G. and Ainley, Walker (1910). Observations on the Production of Immune Substances. Journ. Path. and Bacteriol. XIV. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, L. S. (1908). Acute and Chronic Infections of the Urinary Tract due to the Bacillus coli. Erasmus Wilson Lecture: Reprinted in Lancet, I. 615.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, L. S. (1919). Studies of Bacillary Dysentery occurring in the British Forces in Macedonia. Med. Research Council. Special Report Series, No. 40.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. D. (1918). Standardisation of killed agglutinable cultures of B. dysenteriae. Journ. Hygiene, XVII. No. 4.Google Scholar
Herrold, R. D. and Culver, H. (1919). A study of the Gram Negative Bacilli of Renal Infections. Journ. Infect. Dis. XXIV. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, F. (1920). Common Infections of the Kidneys. Oxford Med. Pub. London.Google Scholar
Lepper, Eliz H. (1921). The production of coliform Infection in the Urinary Tract of Rabbits. Journ. Path. Bacteriol. XXIV. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, M. W. Jr (1917). A case of Cystitis caused by Bacillus coli-haemolyticus. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. LXIX. 1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Th. (1909). Untersuchungen über Hämolyse bei Coli und anderen Darmbakterien. Centralbl. f. Bakt. I. Abt. L. 359.Google Scholar
Schottmüller, H. and Much, H. (1908). Die Opsonine als Differenzierungs und Identifizierungsmittel pathogener Bakterienarten. München. med. Wohnschr. LV. 433.Google Scholar
Thiele, F. H. and Embleton, D. (1914). Paths of Spread of Bacterial Infection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. VII. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wordley, E. (1921). A New Method for the Isolation of Organisms from Faeces and Sputum, with some observations on the presence of Haemolytic Streptococci in Faeces obtained by this Method. Journ. Hygiene, XX. No. 1.Google Scholar