Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:20:16.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prevalence of Fusobacterium necrophorum biovar A in animal faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

G. R. Smith  and
E. A. Thornton
G. R. Smith
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park. London NW1 4RY
E. A. Thornton
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, The Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park. London NW1 4RY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Only a small proportion of animals tested were found to be excreting Fusobacterium necrophorum biovar A, the causative organism of necrobacillosis, in the faeces (3 of 69 wallabies, 1 of 66 deer, 2 of 81 cattle). The two positive cattle belonged to a single group of calves on a farm with a history of necrobacillosis and the litter underfoot also readily yielded biovar A organisms. All attempts to demonstrate biovar A in litter on other farms and in soil from an area populated by wallabies and deer failed. Ruminal contents from young beef cattle proved a fertile source of F. necrophorum biovar A, 15 of 18 animals giving a positive result. It is suggested that disturbance of the gastrointestinal microflora leads to intestinal multiplication and faecal excretion of the organism, which may then give rise to necrobacillosis of the body surface.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 327 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

REFERENCES

1.Smith, GR. Anaerobic bacteria as pathogens in wild and captive animals. Symp Zool Soc Lond 1988; No. 60: 159–73.Google Scholar
2.Simon, PC, Stovell, PL. Diseases of animals associated with Sphaerophorus necrophorus: characteristics of the organism. Vet Bull 1969; 39: 311–5.Google Scholar
3.Fievez, L. Étude comparée des souches de Sphaerophorus necrophorusisolées chez l'homme et chez I'animal. Brussels: Presses Académiques Européennes. 1963.Google Scholar
4.Beerens, H, Fievez, L, Wattre, P. Observations concernant 7 souches appartenant aux espèees Sphaerophorus necrophorus, Sphaerophorus funduliformis, Sphaerophorus pseudonecrophorus. Annls lust Pasteur Lille 1971: 121: 37–41.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Hofstad, T. Fusobaclerium necrophorum pathogenic organism ? J Med Microbiol 1985: 20: vii.Google Scholar
6.Shinjo, T, Fujisawa, T, Mitsuoka, T. Proposal of two subspecies of Fusobacterium necrophorum (Flügge) Moore and Holdeman: Fusobaclerium necrophorum subsp. necrophorum subsp, nov., nom. rev. (ex Flügge 1986), and Fusobaclerium necrophorum subs. funduliforme subsp. nov, nom. rev. (ex Hallé 1989). Int. J Syst Bact 1991: 41: 395–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Smith, GR. Pathogenicity of Fusobaclerium necrophorum biovar B. Res Vet Sci 1992: 52: 260–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Kanoe, M, Imagawa, H, Toda, M. Distribution of Fusobacterium necrophorum in bovine alimentary tracts. Bull Fac Agric Yamagawa Univ 1975: 26: 161–72.Google Scholar
9.Shinjo, T.Miyazato, S.Nakamura, N.. Isolation of Fusobacterium necrophorum from bovine rumen fluid. Bull Fac Agric Miyazaki Univ 1979: 26: 173–7.Google Scholar
10.Berg, JN, Scanlan, CM. Studies of Fusobaclerium necrophorum from bovine hepatic abscesses: biotypcs, quantitation, virulence, and antibiotic susceptibility. Am. J Vet Res 1982: 43: 1580–6.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Jensen, R, Deane, HM. Cooper, LJ. Miller, VA. Graham, WR. The rumenitis liver abscess complex in beef cattle. Am J Vet Res 1954; 15: 202–16.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Smith, GR, Wallace, LM, Noakes, DE. Experimental observations on the pathogenesis of necrobacillosis. Epidemiol Infect 1990: 104: 73–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Smith, GR, Barton, SA, Wallace, LM. A sensitive method for isolating Fusobacterium necrophorum from faeces. Epidemiol Infect 1991: 106: 311–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Smith, GR, Barton, SA, Wallace, LM. Further observations on enhancement of the infectivity of Fusobaclerium necrophorum by other bacteria. Epidemiol Infect 1991: 106: 305–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Berg, JN. Fales, WH, Scanlan, CM. Occurrence of anaerobic bacteria in diseases of the dog and cat. Am, J Vet Res 1979: 40: 870–81.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Smith, GR. Thornton, EA. Effect of disturbance of the gastrointestinal microflora on the faecal excretion of Fusobaclerium necrophorum biovar A. Epidemiol Infect 1993: 110: 333–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Tyndale-Biscoe, H. Life of marsupials. London: Edward Arnold. 1973: 108.Google Scholar