Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:36:50.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections among adolescent men who have sex with men and transgender women in Salvador, Northeast Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2023

Caio Marcellus Oliveira
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Lucas Miranda Marques
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil State University of de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
Danielle Souto de Medeiros
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Valdiele de Jesus Salgado
Affiliation:
State University of de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
Fabiane Soares
Affiliation:
Collective Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Laio Magno
Affiliation:
Collective Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Inês Dourado
Affiliation:
Collective Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Ághata Morgana Bertoti da Silva
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Henrique Inácio Lima de Brito
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Tiana Baqueiro Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
Guilherme Barreto Campos*
Affiliation:
Multidisciplinary Institute for Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Guilherme Barreto Campos; Email: guilhermebcampos@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) and transgender women (ATGW) enrolled as part of the PrEP1519 study between April 2019 and February 2021 in Salvador were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections.We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction using oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral swabs; assessed factors associated with NG and CT infections using multivariable Poisson regression analysis with robust variance; and estimated the prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). In total, 246 participants were included in the analyses (median age: 18.8; IQR: 18.2–19.4 years). The overall oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral prevalence rates of NG were 17.9%, 9.4%, 7.6%, and 1.9%, respectively. For CT, the overall, oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral prevalence rates were 5.9%, 1.2%, 2.4%, and 1.9%, respectively. A low level of education, clinical suspicion of STI (and coinfection with Mycoplasma hominis were associated with NG infection. The prevalence of NG and CT, especially extragenital infections, was high in AMSM and ATGW. These findings highlight the need for testing samples from multiple anatomical sites among adolescents at a higher risk of STI acquisition, implementation of school-based strategies, provision of sexual health education, and reduction in barriers to care.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) significantly impact global health, with more than 1 million new infections estimated to occur daily [Reference Newman1, Reference Rowley2]. Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are two STIs with the highest incidences globally, with approximately 130 million and 78 million cases annually, respectively [Reference Newman1]. Notably, there is disproportionality in the prevalence of these infections between men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) [Reference Grinsztejn3].

Another public health concern is the high prevalence of asymptomatic STIs at extragenital sites. They are usually undiagnosed because most health service providers test for STIs only in symptomatic patients or solely at the urethral site [Reference Chan4]. Interestingly, studies have demonstrated that at least half of NG and CT infections occur at extragenital sites and may remain undiagnosed if testing is performed only at the urethral site [Reference Koedijk5, Reference Reinton6].

Adolescent MSM (AMSM) and TGW (ATGW) are at a greater risk of acquiring STIs than the general population [Reference Shannon and Klausner7] due to their engagement in riskier sexual practices, which are aggravated by sociocultural stigmatisation and difficulty in accessing health care [Reference Kann810]. In Brazil, due to legal and social issues, there is still a lack of data on the prevalence of bacterial STIs among adolescents, especially at extragenital sites. However, the high rates of syphilis and HIV infections indicate that there may be alarming rates of other STIs in this group [11Reference Shannon13]. We investigated the prevalence of NG and CT infections at different anatomical sites among AMSM and ATGW aged 15–19 years living in Salvador, Northeastern Brazil, and assessed the social and behavioural factors associated with these infections.

Methods

Study design, population, and ethical aspects

This study used a cross-sectional study, PrEP1519 study, conducted in the city of Salvador, Bahia, conducted between April 2019 and February 2021 as a baseline. All individuals who visited the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) clinic and met the following inclusion criteria were included in the PrEP1519 study: self-identified AMSM or ATGW, aged 15–19 years, reported sex with a cisgender man or TGW during their lifetime, and living or working in the municipality of Salvador. Individuals under the influence of alcohol or drugs, which compromised their participation at the time of the interview, were excluded. Eligible study participants could choose to use HIV PrEP or other combination prevention strategies (e.g., condoms and HIV testing). For further details on this study, see Dourado et al. [Reference Dourado14].

PrEP1519 was conducted following Brazilian and international ethical research guidelines and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the World Health Organization (Protocol ID: Fiotec-PrEP adolescent study) and the Research Ethics Committee of the Collective Health Institute at the Federal University of Bahia (#001/2019; #89993018.9.3002.5030; #3.224.384). Written informed consent (WIC) was obtained from adolescents aged >18 years or parents (or legal guardians) of minors; additionally, adolescents aged <18 years signed an assent form (AF). In cases where the project psychologist or social worker judged that the adolescent did not have family ties or was at risk of becoming a victim of violence because of his or her sexual orientation or gender identity, only the AF signed by the adolescent was required. Participants could withdraw their consent at any point in the study and refuse to answer any questions or undergo any collection of biological samples.

Recruitment

Recruitment was conducted using demand creation strategies implemented by trained peer educators in youth venues, virtual networks (Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and YouTube), dating apps (Grindr, Tinder, and Badoo), and referrals from health services and nongovernmental organisations. Further details can be found in Magno et al. [Reference Magno15].

Data collection

The participants were examined by a doctor or nurse, and oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral samples were swabbed.

Participants could refuse to participate in any data collection. For the collection of oropharyngeal samples, spatulas were used to press the tongue down to allow friction between the swab and tonsils and behind the uvula. For anal sample collection, the participants were placed in the lateral decubitus position with one of the legs slightly flexed. A swab was then introduced 1–2 cm beyond the rectal sphincter and rotated to obtain the sample. During urethral sample collection, the participant’s foreskin was retracted to expose the glans. A pediatric swab was introduced 1–2 cm into the urethra and slightly rotated to obtain a sample. Once collected, the samples were placed in 15 mL Falcon tubes containing 5 mL of transport medium and stored at 4 °C. Finally, the samples were transported to the laboratory and stored at −20 °C until processing.

STI signs and symptoms, such as urethral discharge, warts, and lesions, dysuria, itching, and irritation were noted. Additionally, participants answered a socio-behavioural questionnaire, administered by trained interviewers and health professionals at baseline, with questions about gender identity, sexual behaviours, alcohol and drug use, HIV prevention methods, and violent and discriminatory experiences. All the collected information was deposited in an online database.

DNA extraction and detection of NG and CT

Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples using the boiling technique and phosphate-buffered saline [Reference Bashiruddin16]. To detect NG and CT infections, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using StepOne and StepOne Plus thermal cyclers (Life Technologies). Additionally, the samples were tested using qPCR for four microorganisms of the Mollicutes class: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG), Mycoplasma hominis (MH), Ureaplasma parvum (UP), and Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU).

Study variables

The primary outcomes were NG/CT-positive or -negative qPCR results, irrespective of the anatomic site (oropharynx, anus, and urethra). The explanatory variables were as follows: age (15–17 and 18–19 years old), race/colour (black or non-black), education level (high school and higher education, primary school students, and young adult education), and sexual orientation (homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual). The other variables required “yes” or “no” answers, and these include current school enrolment; early sexual debut – defined as sexual initiation before or at age 14; steady or casual sexual partner, number of sexual partners (<2 or ≥ 2), receptive or insertive anal sex, anal sex without condoms, transactional sex, and group sex in the last 3 months; clinical suspicion of STIs; reagent syphilis rapid test; and coinfection with MG, MH, UP, or UU.

Data analysis

Descriptive analyses of all variables were performed using absolute and relative frequencies. Numerical variables are described as median and interquartile range (IQR). Positive results for at least one anatomical site (overall) were used to estimate the prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Positive results in at least one anatomical site were also considered for coinfection with MG, MH, UP, or UU. Participants with no data for the three anatomical sites were excluded from the denominator (sample size: NG, n = 207; CT, n = 204; and coinfection, n = 202). The prevalence of each type of infection was estimated for each anatomical site (oropharynx, anus, or urethra).

We calculated the rate of diagnostic loss if samples were to be collected from genital sites only, using the formula below: Pearson’s chi-square test was used to identify statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Only participants who agreed to undergo collection at all three anatomical sites were included in this analysis.

$$ \frac{\left(\mathrm{Prevalence}\;\left[\%\right]\;\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{infection}\ \mathrm{atanatomical}\ \mathrm{site}\hbox{-} \mathrm{Overall}\ \mathrm{prevalence}\;\left[\%\right]\right) \times 100\%}{\mathrm{Overall}\ \mathrm{prevalence}\;\left[\%\right]} $$

Bivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression with robust variance, estimating the prevalence ratios (PRs) and respective 95% CI. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used for bivariate analysis. Variables with a p-value <0.20 were selected for multivariable analysis. The Akaike and Bayesian information criteria were compared using multivariable models. The adequacy of the final model was determined using the chi-square test; statistical significance was set at 5%.

Statistical software STATA version 15.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, USA) was used for all analyses.

Results

A total of 246 participants were included in the study: 231 were identified as AMSM and 15 as ATGW. Most adolescents were between 18 and 19 years old (85.4%) with a median age of 18.8 (IQR: 18.2–19.4) and were black (85.8%). Approximately, 83.3% had high school or higher education, and 74.6% were currently studying. Additionally, 64.2% identified themselves as homosexual, and 51.3% initiated their sexual life before age 14. As for sexual behaviour in the past 3 months, 54.5%, 65.6%, and 46.3% of participants reported having a steady partner, at least one casual sexual partner, and at least two sexual partners of any kind, respectively. Furthermore, 72.1% and 60.3% engaged in receptive and insertive anal sex, respectively, and 9.5% and 16.4% engaged in transactional and group sex, respectively. Unprotected anal sex with steady and/or casual partners was reported by 60.7% of the participants. Clinical suspicion of STI was detected in 9.7% of the population. Twenty-six (10.7%) participants had a positive syphilis rapid test, and MG, MH, UP, and UU were detected in 5.7%, 13.4%, 3.3%, and 20.7% of the samples, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the AHSH and ATGW population (n = 246). PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

A total of 245, 210, and 213 samples were obtained from the oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral sites, respectively. Considering the presence of bacteria in at least one of the anatomical sites, the prevalence rates of NG, CT, and coinfections were 17.9% (95% CI: 13.2–23.7%), 5.9% (95% CI: 3.4–10.1%), and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1–3.5%), respectively.

The prevalence of NG infection was 9.4%, 7.6%, and 1.9% in the oropharyngeal, anal, and urethral sites, respectively. In contrast, the highest CT prevalence occurred at the anal site (2.4%), followed by the urethral (1.9%) and oropharyngeal (1.2%) sites (Table 2).

Table 2. Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis between AHSH and ATGW, according to anatomical site. PREP1519, Brazil, 2021

* 95%CI: 95% Confidence interval

The missed opportunity for diagnosis of NG would happen in 37.5%, 53.1%, and 90.6% of the cases in exclusively oropharyngeal, anal, or urethral testing. Likewise, for CT, the diagnostic loss would be 80.0% at the oropharyngeal site and 60.0% at the anal and urethral sites. Statistically significant differences were observed for anal and urethral exclusive testing in the detection of NG, and oropharyngeal testing for CT (Table 3).

Table 3. Diagnostic loss rates by anatomical site between AHSH and ATGW (n = 202). PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Note: Bold values indicate statistical significance.

In the bivariate analysis, the prevalence of NG was higher among adolescents who had a casual sex partner in the last 3 months, practised receptive anal intercourse, and had a concomitant infection with MH. No factors were associated with CT infections (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate analysis of the factors associated with the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among AMSM and ATGW. PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Note: Bold values indicate statistical significance.

a n, absolute frequency of STI.

b P, Prevalence of STI.

c PR, Prevalence ratio.

d 95%CI, 95%Confidence interval.

In multivariable analysis, a low level of education (PR = 2.61; 95% CI: 1.35–5.02), clinical suspicion of STI (PR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.01–4.08), and coinfection with MH (PR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.18–4.12) were associated with NG infection at any site (Table 5). No factors were associated with CT infections.

Table 5. Multivariable analysis for the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among AMSM and ATGW. PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Note: Bold values indicate statistical significance.

a PR, adjusted prevalence ratio.

b 95%CI, 95% confidence interval.

Considering each anatomical site, the analyses revealed a significant association between receptive anal sex and NG infection at the oropharyngeal site (p = 0.042), and coinfection with MG was associated with NG infection at the urethral site (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).

Discussion

This work was one of the first carried out in Brazil to report a high prevalence of NG and CT infections in AMSM and ATGW. Low levels of education, clinical suspicion of STI, and coinfection with MH were associated with an increased prevalence of NG infection. We also observed a high infection rate at extragenital sites, which would not have been diagnosed if only the urethral site had been tested.

Our study found higher rates of NG and CT infections among the participants than in the general population. Worldwide, the prevalence of NG and CT infections among men aged 15–49 is estimated at 0.7% and 2.7%, respectively [Reference Rowley2]. Data on the prevalence of these infections is scarce among adolescent men, especially in Brazil; however, some studies have indicated that these rates are lower than those we found. A study conducted in South Africa found a prevalence of 2.3% and 1.6% of NG and CT cases among adolescent men aged 15–19 years old [Reference Francis17]. Another investigation in Colombian high schools reported only 1.1% and 0% of CT and NG infections among adolescent men aged 14–19 years, respectively [Reference Paredes18].

In addition, sexual minority adolescents are more vulnerable to acquiring STIs as they start sexual practices earlier, have more sexual partners, and engage in unprotected sex [Reference Kann8,Reference Rasberry9]. Thus, PrEP programs may provide an excellent opportunity for managers to implement more effective strategies to prevent STIs, such as periodic STI testing, condom and lubricant accessibility, viral hepatitis vaccination, counselling services, and mental health screening [Reference Ong19]. Furthermore, these programmes can serve as a gateway for vulnerable populations at high risk of acquiring HIV and other STIs who often feel discriminated against by health services [Reference Knight and Jarrett20, Reference Rocon21].

STI testing is one of the main pillars for preventing STIs, as it identifies reservoirs of pathogens associated with these infections, enabling the interruption of the transmission chain through the treatment of those diagnosed [Reference Reinton6]. However, sexual health services are neglected and underfunded globally [Reference Ong19]. These infections typically do not manifest symptoms when present at extragenital sites. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Brazilian Ministry of Health recommend extragenital testing for sexually transmitted microorganisms based on the sexual behaviour reported by individuals at a higher risk of infection [22, Reference Workowski and Bolan23]. However, the frequency of these tests tends to be lower than recommended [Reference Chan4, Reference Earnest24].

The highest prevalence of NG infection was observed at the oropharyngeal sites, followed by the anal and urethral sites. In our study, up to 90.6% of NG infections would not be diagnosed if the testing occurred only at the urethral site. Similarly, in a study conducted by Jansen et al. [Reference Jansen25], it was observed that only 27.7% of STIs from MSM at STI clinics in Germany would have been diagnosed if sample collection was only at urogenital sites. A study conducted between 2010 and 2012 in Brazil with adult MSM [Reference Cunha26] reported that 2.5% had NG-positive results detected only at the rectal site. Another study carried out in Los Angeles and New Orleans (USA), with young people aged 14–24 years in situations of social vulnerability, found prevalence rates of 6.5%, 6.9%, and 1.4% of NG infections at oropharyngeal, rectal, and urethral sites, respectively, among MSM, and 4.5%, 7.9%, and 1.5% among TGW. However, only 15.0% of participants who tested positive had only NG or CT infection at the urethral site [Reference Shannon13].

Studies have also shown high rates of CT infections at different anatomical sites in sexual minorities. Barbosa et al. [Reference Barbosa27] reported a 12.1% rate of urethral CT infection in adult MSM who visited STI clinics in large metropolitan centres in Brazil in 2005. These findings are similar to those found in a study by Cunha et al. [Reference Cunha26], who found a 10.0% prevalence of rectal CT among adult MSM. When comparing anatomical sites, the highest prevalence of CT infection was observed at the anal site, followed by the oropharyngeal and urethral sites. Similar results were found in a study by Jansen et al. [Reference Jansen25], in which 7.7%, 1.1%, and 2.0% of participants had rectal, oropharyngeal, and urethral infections, respectively. As for NG infections, most of the CT infection diagnoses in the present study (60.0%) would not be detected if the collection was performed only at the urethral site; these results agree with evidence in the literature [Reference Koedijk5, Reference Reinton6, Reference Papp28]. These findings reinforce the importance of analysing samples from multiple anatomical sites in individuals at high risk of acquiring an STI as a syndromic approach, and screening only with urethral samples detects a minority of cases.

A low level of education is an essential risk factor for acquiring NG infections, corroborating the findings of this study. A study carried out with adult MSM in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, found an association between the level of education and NG infection (OR = 3.38) [Reference Jean Louis29]. Other studies have demonstrated an association between social vulnerability factors and the adolescent acquisition of STIs, including NG and CT [Reference Costa30, Reference Costa31]. Violent experiences, licit/illicit drug use, homelessness, poverty, and the low level of schooling of youths and their parents increase the chances of poor decision-making and risky behaviours, including those related to sexual behaviour, that are harmful to health [Reference Costa30, Reference Costa31]. Although most of the population of our study have already completed high school and could not receive further intervention in this setting, there is a need to implement sexual health education and school permanence strategies for adolescents to mitigate these effects, especially programmes that consider the specificities of young people in sexual minority groups [Reference Borawski32Reference O’Farrell, Corcoran and Davoren35].

Of all the other microorganisms tested, only MH was associated with NG infection. MH is a bacterium commonly found in the genital tract, although it can also be found in extragenital sites [Reference Ahmed36, Reference Salgado, de Abreu Oliveira, da Silva, de Brito, de Medeiros, Soares, Magno, Dourado, Campos and Marques37]. Its pathogenicity remains inconclusive, but it is potentially associated with non-gonococcal urethritis and male infertility [Reference Ahmed36Reference Sahrier and Kukul38]. The clinical suspicion of an STI, defined as the presence of signs and/or symptoms of an STI, was also associated with the detection of NG in our study. However, it is important to note that many of the symptoms observed are not specific to NG infection, especially at extragenital sites, and could be caused by other STIs.

This study had limitations. First, using convenience sampling, that is, including only individuals at a high risk of acquiring HIV and PrEP users, a certain degree of selection bias may have occurred. Second, the small sample size of this study may have hampered the sample power for some variables. Third, for CT infections, we could not properly assess the associated factors using multivariable analysis. In addition, it was not possible to perform an analysis based on the stratification of gender identity because of the small number of ATGW subgroups. However, this did not compromise the other associations observed in the present study.

Conclusion

The prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in AMSM and ATGW was high, demonstrating the high vulnerability of these populations to these infections. In addition, the high prevalence of extragenital infections highlights the need to incorporate multiple anatomical site testing into routine health services not only for adult MSM and TGW but also for AMSM and ATGW. Finally, this study highlights the need to develop strategies that can offer adolescents access to sexual health education, technologies, and services for STI prevention to promote a welcoming environment that meets their specific demands.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026882300170X.

Data availability statement

Raw data for this study is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the adolescents who participated in this study and their parents and guardians, and the Brazilian Ministry of Health, through the Department of Chronic Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Bahia State Departments of Health and Justice, and Salvador City Department of Health.

Author contributions

Investigation: A.M.B.D.S., C.M.O., D.S.d.M., F.S., H.I.L.d.B., L.M., T.F., V.d.J.S., L.M.M.; Methodology: A.M.B.D.S., C.M.O., D.S.d.M., F.S., G.B.C., H.I.L.d.B., T.F., V.d.J.S., L.M.M.; Formal analysis: C.M.O., D.S.d.M., F.S., G.B.C., V.d.J.S., L.M.M.; Writing – original draft: C.M.O., D.S.d.M., F.S., G.B.C., I.D., L.M., T.F., L.M.M.; Writing – review & editing: C.M.O., D.S.d.M., F.S., G.B.C., I.D., L.M., T.F., L.M.M.; Validation: D.S.d.M., G.B.C., L.M., V.d.J.S.; Conceptualization: G.B.C., I.D., L.M., L.M.M.; Data curation: G.B.C., I.D., L.M.; Supervision: G.B.C., I.D., L.M., T.F., L.M.M.; Funding acquisition: I.D., L.M.

Financial support

This study was supported by UNITAID (grant number: 2017–2115-FIOTECPrEP). UNITAID is a partnership that is hosted by the World Health Organization, that accelerates access to innovative health products and lays the foundations for their scale-up by countries and partners.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

References

Newman, L, et al. (2015) Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One 10, e0143304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowley, J, et al. (2019) Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 97, 548562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinsztejn, B, et al. (2017) Unveiling of HIV dynamics among transgender women: a respondent-driven sampling study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Lancet HIV 4, e169e176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, P, et al. (2016) Extragenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a review of the literature. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2016, 5758387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koedijk, F, et al. (2012) The value of testing multiple anatomic sites for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in sexually transmitted infection centres in the Netherlands, 2006–2010. International Journal of STD & AIDS 23, 626631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinton, N, et al. (2013) Anatomic distribution of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium infections in men who have sex with men. Sexual Health 10, 199203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shannon, CL, Klausner, JD (2018) The growing epidemic of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a neglected population. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 30, 137143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kann, L, et al. (2018) Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States. Morbity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveilance Summaries 67, 1114.Google ScholarPubMed
Rasberry, CN, et al. (2018) Sexual risk behavior differences among sexual minority high school students - United States, 2015 and 2017. Morbity and Mortality Weekly Report 67, 10071011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2017) Implementation tool for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV infection. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2018, WHO Reference no WHO/CDS/HIV/18.13. (Module 12: Adolescents and young adults).Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (2022) Boletim epidemiológico HIV/AIDS|2022. Brasília, DF, Brazil: Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, 2022. (Boletins epidemiológicos; HIV/AIDS; S.n. 2022).Google Scholar
Ministry of Health (2022) Boletim epidemiológico sífilis|2022. Brasília, DF, Brazil: Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, 2022. (Boletins epidemiológicos; sífilis; S.n. 2022).Google Scholar
Shannon, CL, et al. (2019) Sexually transmitted infection positivity among adolescents with or at high-risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection in Los Angeles and New Orleans. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 46, 737742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dourado, I, et al. (2023) Interdisciplinarity in HIV prevention research: the experience of the PrEP1519 study protocol among adolescent MSM and TGW in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 39(Suppl 1), e00143221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magno, L, et al. (2022) Reaching out to adolescents at high risk of HIV infection in Brazil: demand creation strategies for PrEP and other HIV combination prevention methods. Archives of Sexual Behavior 52, 703719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bashiruddin, JB (1998) Extraction of DNA from mycoplasmas. Methods in Molecular Biology 104, 141144.Google ScholarPubMed
Francis, SC, et al. (2018) Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among young people in South Africa: a nested survey in a health and demographic surveillance site. PLoS Medicine 15, e1002512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paredes, MC, et al. (2015) Prevalencia de infecciones por Chlamydia trachomatis y Neisseria gonorrhoeae en adolescentes de colegios de la provincia de Sabana Centro, Cundinamarca, Colombia. Biomédica 35, 314324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, JJ, et al. (2021) Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted infections testing for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review. Journal of the International AIDS Society 24, e25673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, DA, Jarrett, D (2015) Preventive health care for men who have sex with men. American Family Physician 91, 844851.Google ScholarPubMed
Rocon, PC, et al. (2020) Acesso à saúde pela população trans no Brasil: Nas entrelinhas da revisão integrativa. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde. Published online: 11 November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health (2022) Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas para atenção integral às pessoas com infecções sexualmente transmissíveis (IST). Brasília, DF, Brazil: Departamento de HIV/AIDS, Tuberculose, Hepatites Virais e Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis (PCDTs; IST; S.n. 2022).Google Scholar
Workowski, KA, Bolan, GA (2015) Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports 64, 1137.Google ScholarPubMed
Earnest, R, et al. (2020) Population-level benefits of extragenital gonorrhea screening among men who have sex with men: an exploratory modeling analysis. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 47, 484490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, K, et al. (2020) STI in times of PrEP: high prevalence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and mycoplasma at different anatomic sites in men who have sex with men in Germany. BMC Infectious Diseases 20, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunha, CB, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and syphilis among men who have sex with men in Brazil. BMC Public Health 15, 686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, MJ, et al. (2010) Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men attending STD clinics in Brazil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 43, 500503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papp, JR, et al. (2014) Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports 63, 119.Google Scholar
Jean Louis, F, et al. (2020) Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in men having sex with men in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 10, e033976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, MIF, et al. (2016) Social determinants of health: risks and vulnerability in adolescence. International Archives of Medicine 9, 19.Google Scholar
Costa, MIF, et al. (2020) Adolescents in situations of poverty: resilience and vulnerabilities to sexually transmitted infections. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 73(suppl 4), e20190242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borawski, EA, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of health education teachers and school nurses teaching sexually transmitted infections/human immunodeficiency virus prevention knowledge and skills in high school. The Journal of School Health 85, 189196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KM, et al. (2020) Brief report: sexual debut among 14- to 17-year-old sexual minority males: a preliminary investigation of early HIV risk and sexual health needs. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 84, 280284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, KM, Pantalone, DW, Carey, MP (2019) Sexual health education for adolescent males who are interested in sex with males: an investigation of experiences, preferences, and needs. The Journal of Adolescent Health 64, 3642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Farrell, M, Corcoran, P, Davoren, MP (2021) Examining LGBTI+ inclusive sexual health education from the perspective of both youth and facilitators: a systematic review. BMJ Open 11, e047856e047856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, J, et al. (2020) Mycoplasma hominis: an under recognized pathogen. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 39, 8897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salgado, VJ, de Abreu Oliveira, CMP, da Silva, ÁMB, de Brito, HIL, de Medeiros, DS, Soares, F, Magno, L, Dourado, I, Campos, GB, Marques, LM (2023) Prevalence of Mollicutes among men who have sex with men and transgender women aged 15 to 19 years in Salvador, North-eastern Brazil. BioMed Central Infectious Diseases 23(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08213-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahrier, M, Kukul, E (2019) Classification of non-gonococcal urethritis: a review. International Urology and Nephrology 51, 901907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of the AHSH and ATGW population (n = 246). PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Figure 1

Table 2. Prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis between AHSH and ATGW, according to anatomical site. PREP1519, Brazil, 2021

Figure 2

Table 3. Diagnostic loss rates by anatomical site between AHSH and ATGW (n = 202). PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Figure 3

Table 4. Bivariate analysis of the factors associated with the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among AMSM and ATGW. PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Figure 4

Table 5. Multivariable analysis for the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among AMSM and ATGW. PrEP1519, Brazil, 2021

Supplementary material: File

Oliveira et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 48 KB