Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:25:48.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative immunogenicity in mice of whole and split influenza virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. S. Gandhi
S. S. Gandhi
Affiliation:
National Biological Standards Laboratory, Viral Products Section, 45 Poplar Road, Private Bag No. 7, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relative immunogenicity in mice of whole influenza virus, and virus split with different disrupting agents, was compared. Using the single radial immunodiffusion test to estimate the haemagglutinin antigen concentration in different virus preparations, it was found that, in general, split virus preparations induced substantially lower titres of HI antibody in mice than whole virus after one or two injections of the antigen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 1978 , pp. 337 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Barry, D. W., Staton, E. & Mayner, R. E. (1974). Inactivated influenza vaccine efficacy: diminished antigenicity of split-product vaccines in mice. Infection and Immunity 10, 1329–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, D. W., Mayner, R. E., Staton, E., Dunlap, R. C., Rastogi, S. C., Hannah, J. E., Blackburn, R. J., Nortman, D. F. & Graze, P. R. (1976). Comparative trial of influenza vaccines. I. Immunogenicity of whole virus and split product vaccines in man. American Journal of Epidemiology 104, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, C. M. & Skehel, J. J. (1972). Crystalline antigen from the influenza virus envelope. Nature, New Biology 238, 145–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Brandon, F. M., Webster, R. G., Barrett, C. D. Jr & Lease, Q. O. (1964). Comparisons of serologic and febrile responses in humans to vaccination with influenza A viruses or their haemagglutinins. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 63, 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Davenport, F. M. (1968). Antigenic enhancement of ether-extracted influenza virus vaccine by AlPO4. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 127, 587–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, J. G., Zola, H., Christle, G. H. & Courtenay, B. M. (1971). Studies on immunological paralysis: V. The influence of molecular weight on the immunogenicity, tolerogenicity and antibody-neutralizing activity of type III pneumococcal polysaccharide. Immunology 21, 535–46.Google Scholar
Isaacs, A. & Bozzo, A. (1951). The use of V. cholerae filtrates in the destruction of nonspecific inhibitor in ferret sera. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 32, 325–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Neurath, A. R., Stasny, J. T., Rubin, B. A., Fontes, A. K., Pierzchala, W. A., Wiener, F. P. & Hartzell, R. W. (1970). The effect of nonaqueous solvents on the quaternary structure of viruses: properties of haemagglutinins obtained by disruption of influenza viruses with tri(n-butyl) phosphate. Microbios 2, 209–24.Google Scholar
Neurath, A. R. & Rubin, B. A. (1971). Viral structural components as immunogens of prophylactic value. In Monograph in Virology (ed. Melnick, J. L.), vol. 4. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. F., Dowdle, W. R., Coleman, M. T. & Schild, G. C. (1975) Advanced laboratory techniques for influenza diagnosis. Immunology Series No. 6. U.S. Dept. Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
Parkman, P. D., Galasso, G. J., Top, F. H. Jr & Noble, G. E. (1976). Summary of clinical trials of influenza vaccines. Journal of Infectious Diseases 134, 100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, F. T. & Regamey, R. H. (eds.) (1973). Proceedings of an International Symposium on Influenza Vaccines for Men and Horses, London, November 1972. Symposia Series in Immunobiological Standardization, vol. 20. Basal: Karger.Google Scholar
Rubin, B. A., Pierzchala, W. A. & Neurath, A.R.(1967). Elicitation of antibody response against influenza viruses by different viral subunit preparations. Archiv fur die gesamte Virusforschung 20, 268–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schild, G.C, Wood, J. M. & Newman, R. W. (1975). A single-radial-immunodiffusion technique for the assay of influenza haemagglutinin antigen. Proposals for an assay method for the haemagglutinin content of influenza vaccines. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 52, 223–31Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, R. G. & Laver, W. G. (1966). Influenza virus vaccines: immunogenicity and lack of toxicity for rabbits of ether- and detergent-disrupted virus. Journal of Immunology 96, 596–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed