Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:14:58.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neuraxial blockade and patient risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2005

B. J. Egan
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
A. R. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogdanov A, Loveland R. Is there a place for interscalene block performed after induction of general anaesthesia? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 107110.Google Scholar
Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Kalberer F, Benz C. Acute and nonacute complications associated with interscalene block and shoulder surgery: a prospective study. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 875880.Google Scholar
Benumof JL. Permanent loss of cervical spinal cord function associated with interscalene block performed under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 15411544.Google Scholar
Horlocker T. Neurologic complications of neuraxial and peripheral blockade. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: R14.Google Scholar
Selander D, Sjostrand J. Longitudinal spread of intraneurally injected local anesthetics. An experimental study of the initial neural distribution following intraneural injections. Acta Anaesthiol Scand 1978; 22: 622634.Google Scholar
Hadzic A. Complications of regional anesthesia, http://www. nysora.com/publications/publications.htm, 11 May 2005.