Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:30:49.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perioperative feasibility of imaging the heart and pleura in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

C.-J. Jakobsen ,
P. Torp  and
E. Sloth
C.-J. Jakobsen*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
P. Torp
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
E. Sloth
Affiliation:
Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
*
Correspondence to: Carl-Johan Jakobsen, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. E-mail: cjj@dadlnet.dk; Tel: +45 89498751; Fax: +45 89498809
Get access

Summary

Background

The postoperative monitoring and treatment of the patient undergoing aortic valve replacement is a complex challenge. Echocardiography is the only method which provides dynamic and real-time bedside imaging of the heart. Focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to provide a usable window for cardiac imaging in a mixed ICU population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of perioperative imaging of the heart and pleura according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography protocol in patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement.

Method

Thirty-five adult patients scheduled for aortic valve replacement were followed perioperatively with focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography examinations. A Vivid-7 echo-machine and a 2.5 MHz matrix transducer with second-harmonic imaging were used for data acquisition. The image quality for the cardiac window was graded 1–5 (1 = no image, 2 = poor and unusable image quality, 3 = usable image quality, 4 = good image quality and 5 = perfect image quality). A score ⩾3 equalled an image quality judged to be of sufficient quality to be interpreted and thereby to contribute to clinical decision-making.

Results

All patients had at least one usable window preoperatively. At least one usable window was obtained in 88% of patients on the first postoperative day, and in 97% at discharge. The image quality changed over time, with the poorest quality being observed on the first postoperative day. The apical view with the patient in the left lateral position provided the best cardiac window on all occasions. The presence of drains did not significantly affect the achievability of a satisfactory examination. The number of patients with pleural effusion was relatively high. On the first postoperative day, 10 subjects had unilateral and one subject had bilateral pleural effusions. At discharge, 14 patients had unilateral and four patients had bilateral effusions.

Conclusions

We conclude that the image quality of the heart and pleura, according to the focused assessed transthoracic echocardiography concept, is sufficient to undergo interpretation and thereby contribute to the perioperative clinical decision-making in patients with aortic stenosis.

Keywords

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, transthoracic, transoesophagealMONITORING INTRAOPERATIVEHEART DISEASES, aortic valveCARDIAC SURGERY
Type
EACTA Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 24 , Issue 7 , July 2007 , pp. 589 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Slogoff, S, Keats, AS. Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction? Anesthesiology 1985; 62 (2): 107–114.Google Scholar
2.Reich, DL, Bodian, CA, Krol, M, Kuroda, M, Osinski, T, Thys, DM. Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 89 (4): 814–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Reich, DL, Bennett-Guerrero, E, Bodian, CA, Hossain, S, Winfree, W, Krol, M. Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in non-cardiac surgery of long duration. Anesth Analg 2002; 95 (2): 273–274.Google Scholar
4.Poulsen, SH, Andersen, NH, Ivarsen, PI, Mogensen, CE, Egeblad, H. Doppler tissue imaging reveals systolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension and apparent “isolated” diastolic dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16 (7): 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Bruch, C, Comber, M, Schmermund, A, Eggebrecht, H, Bartel, T, Erbel, R. Diagnostic usefulness and impact on management of transoesophageal echocardiography in surgical intensive care units. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91 (4): 510–513.Google Scholar
6.Mandavia, DP, Hoffner, RJ, Mahaney, K, Henderson, SO. Bedside echocardiography by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38 (4): 377–382.Google Scholar
7.Tuman, KJ, McCarthy, RJ, March, RJ, Najafi, H, Ivankovich, AD. Morbidity and duration of ICU stay after cardiac surgery. A model for preoperative risk assessment. Chest 1992; 102: 23–44.Google Scholar
8.Roques, F, Nashef, SAM, Michel, P et al. . Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19 030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15: 816–823.Google Scholar
9.Jakobsen, C, Torp, P, Sloth, E. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction may invalidate the reliability of EuroSCORE. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29 (6): 978–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Jensen, MB, Sloth, E, Larsen, KM, Schmidt, MB. Transthoracic echocardiography for cardio-pulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anaesth 2004; 21: 700–707.Google Scholar
11.Schmidlin, D, Schuepbach, R, Bernard, E, Echnauer, E, Jenny, R, Schmid, E. Indications and impact of postoperative transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (11): 2143–2148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Joseph, MX, Disney, PJ, Da Costa, R, Hutchison, SJ. Transthoracic echocardiography to identify or exclude cardiac cause of shock. Chest 2004; 126 (5): 1592–1597.Google Scholar
13.Feigenbaum, H, Armstrong, WF, Ryan, T. Echocardiography, 6th edn. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.Google Scholar
14.Michard, F, Teboul, JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000–2008.Google Scholar