Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:01:13.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Propofol sedation with fentanyl or midazolam during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2005

N. Disma ,
M. Astuto ,
G. Rizzo ,
G. Rosano ,
P. Naso ,
G. Aprile ,
G. Bonanno  and
A. Russo
N. Disma
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Anesthesiology Unit, Catania, Italy
M. Astuto
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Anesthesiology Unit, Catania, Italy
G. Rizzo
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Anesthesiology Unit, Catania, Italy
G. Rosano
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Anesthesiology Unit, Catania, Italy
P. Naso
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Gastroenterology Unit, Catania, Italy
G. Aprile
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Gastroenterology Unit, Catania, Italy
G. Bonanno
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Gastroenterology Unit, Catania, Italy
A. Russo
Affiliation:
University of Catania, Policlinic, Gastroenterology Unit, Catania, Italy
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objective: Sedation is commonly used to facilitate diagnostic procedures in children. The aim of our study was to investigate sedation in children using propofol alone or combined with fentanyl or midazolam with regard to efficacy, adverse reactions or side-effects related to the drugs, ease of operation for the endoscopist, and time to discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit. Methods: We prospectively studied 240 children, aged 1–12 yr of age, undergoing endoscopic procedures of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The patients were given an oral premedication with midazolam (0.5 mg kg−1) and were then randomly allocated to one of the three study groups: propofol alone (Group P), propofol with fentanyl 1 μg kg−1 (Group PF) or propofol with midazolam 0.1 mg kg−1 (Group PM). Additional doses of propofol given during the procedure were recorded. Adequacy of sedation and ease of procedure (easy, adequate, impossible) were evaluated by the endoscopist, who was blinded as to the drugs used. Results: The duration of the procedure and the recovery period were similar in the three groups. The number of patients requiring supplemental doses of propofol to permit safe completion of gastroscopy was 31 in Group P (=39%; eight of these required two additional doses), 14 in Group PM (=18%), and 11 in Group PF (=13%) (P < 0.05). There was a lower incidence of adverse events in Group PM and in Group PF than in Group P (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Propofol in combination with fentanyl or midazolam gives better sedation and ease of endoscopy than propofol alone.

Keywords

CONSCIOUS SEDATIONCHILDPROPOFOLMIDAZOLAMFENTANYLGASTROSCOPY
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 22 , Issue 11 , November 2005 , pp. 848 - 852
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1004–1017.
Meretoja OA, Taivainen T, Raiha L, Korpela R, Wirtavuori K. Sevoflurane–nitrous oxide for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 767–771.Google Scholar
Montes RG, Bohn RA. Deep sedation with inhaled sevoflurane for pediatric outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000; 31: 41–46.Google Scholar
Elitsur Y, Blankenship P, Lawerence Z. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in children. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 788–791.Google Scholar
Shafer A, Doze VA, Shafer SL, White PF. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusion during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 348–356.Google Scholar
Morgan DJ, Campbell GA, Crankshaw DP. Pharmacokinetics of propofol when given by intravenous infusion. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 30: 144–148.Google Scholar
Evaluation and Preparation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia. American Academy of Pediatrics. Section on Anesthesiology. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 502–508.
Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970; 49: 924–934.Google Scholar
Bishop PR, Nowicki MJ, May WL, Elkin D, Parker PH. Unsedated upper endoscopy in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 624–630.Google Scholar
Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP, Rockwell DT, Wong JH, Tait AR. Sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 743–748.Google Scholar
Martlew RA, Meakin G, Wadsworth R, Sharples A, Baker RD. Dose of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: effect of premedication with midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 308–309.Google Scholar
Vuyk J. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic interactions between opioid and propofol. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9: 23S–26S.Google Scholar
Short TG, Chui PT. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 539–545.Google Scholar
Cohen LB, Hightower CD, Wood DA, Miller KM, Aisenberg J. Moderate level of sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 795–803.Google Scholar
Smallman B. Pediatric sedation: can it be safely performed by non-anesthesiologists? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2002; 15: 455–459.Google Scholar
Hassall E. Should pediatric gastroenterologists be i.v. drug users? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1993; 16: 370–372.Google Scholar
Sury MRJ, Hatch DJ, Deeley T, Dicks-Mireaux C, Chong WK. Development of a nurse-led sedation service for paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1999; 353: 1667–1671.Google Scholar
Squires RH Jr, Morriss F, Schluterman S, Drew B, Galyen L, Brown KO. Efficacy, safety, and cost of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia in children undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 99–104.Google Scholar
Schwartz DA, Connelly NR, Theroux CA et al. Gastric contents in children presenting for upper endoscopy. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 757–760.Google Scholar
Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 240–243.Google Scholar
Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus EP, Hertan HI, Pitchumoni CS. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1476–1479.Google Scholar
Hannallah RS, Britton JT, Schafer PG, Patel RI, Norden JM et al. Propofol anaesthesia in paediatric ambulatory patients: a comparison with thiopentone and halotane. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 12–18.Google Scholar
Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 307–310.Google Scholar