Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:53:29.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The recruitment of EEA and non-EEA doctors to Specialist Registrar posts in anaesthesia in the Wessex Region of the UK: a retrospective study of factors influencing successful appointment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2004

P. M. Spargo
Affiliation:
Southampton General Hospital, Shackleton Department of Anaesthesia, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
I. H. Lewis
Affiliation:
University Hospital, The University of Michigan Department of Anesthesiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Get access

Abstract

Summary

Background and objective: A retrospective analysis of applicants to Specialist Registrar training posts in anaesthesia in the Wessex Region of the UK was undertaken.

Methods: Applicants whose primary medical qualification was obtained in the European Economic Area were compared to applicants whose primary medical qualification was obtained outside it. The time since qualification, the time spent in anaesthesia, the time spent in other specialities, the post currently held and the success of the application were recorded.

Results: For doctors with a primary medical qualification from outside the European Economic Area, the median time since obtaining that qualification was 12.0 yr compared with 6.0 yr for doctors qualifying within it (P = 0.0001, U-test). Thirteen out of 89 (15%) doctors whose primary medical qualification was from outside the European Economic Area and 39 out of 61 (64%) doctors whose primary medical qualification was from within it were shortlisted for interview (P = 0.0001, χ2-test). Six out of 13 (46%) shortlisted doctors from outside the European Economic Area were appointed at interview compared with 24 out of 39 (62%) shortlisted doctors who qualified within it (P = 0.33, χ2-test).

Conclusions: In the Wessex Region of the UK, applicants whose primary medical qualification is obtained within the European Economic Area are approximately four times as likely to be shortlisted than doctors qualifying outside it. However, after shortlisting, both categories are equally likely to be successful at interview.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2004 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. Department of Health, UK, 2000.
Constable J, Fish I, McKenna C. A quick guide to working in the United Kingdom. BMJ 2002; 325 (Careers Suppl 16 November): 153173.Google Scholar
McKeigue PM, Richards JDM, Richards P. Effects of discrimination by sex and race on the early careers of British medical undergraduates during 1981–1987. BMJ 1990; 301: 961964.Google Scholar
Esmail A, Everington S. Racial discrimination against doctors from ethnic minorities. BMJ 1993; 306: 691692.Google Scholar
Wood L. ‘Longlisting’ from application forms. BMJ 1999; 318 (Careers Suppl 6 February): 23.Google Scholar
Paice E, Leaver P. Improving the training of SHOs. BMJ 1999; 318: 10221023.Google Scholar
Jackson C, Ball J, Hirsch W, Kidd J. Informing Choices: the Need for Career Advice in Medical Training. National Institute for Careers Education and Counselling (NICEC), 2003.
General Medical Council.The Early Years. London, UK: GMC, 1998.