Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:49:53.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2005

A. Bogdanov  and
R. Loveland
A. Bogdanov
Affiliation:
Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK
R. Loveland
Affiliation:
Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 22 , Issue 10 , October 2005 , pp. 801 - 802
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogdanov A, Loveland R. Is there a place for interscalene block performed after induction of general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 107–110.Google Scholar
Fisher H. Regional anaesthesia – before or after general? Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 727–729.Google Scholar
Boezaart AP. Evolution of interscalene block. http://www.anesth.uiowa.edu/cv.asp?ID=434 (accessed 14/6/2005).
Benumof JL. Permanent loss of cervical spinal cord function associated with interscalene block performed under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1541–1544.Google Scholar
Horlocker TT, Abel MD, Messick Jr JM, Schroeder DR. Small risk of serious neurologic complications related to lumbar epidural catheter placement in anaesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1547–1552.Google Scholar