Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:42:11.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-autonomous higher-order Moreau's sweeping process: Well-posedness, stability and Zeno trajectories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

BERNARD BROGLIATO
BERNARD BROGLIATO*
Affiliation:
University Grenoble-Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000 Grenoble, France email: bernard.brogliato@inria.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this article, we study the higher-order Moreau's sweeping process introduced in [1], in the case where an exogenous time-varying function u(·) is present in both the linear dynamics and in the unilateral constraints. First, we show that the well-posedness results (existence and uniqueness of solutions) obtained in [1] for the autonomous case, extend to the non-autonomous case when u(·) is smooth and piece-wise analytic, after a suitable state transformation is done. Stability issues are discussed. The complexity of such non-smooth non-autonomous dynamical systems is illustrated in a particular case named the higher-order bouncing ball, where trajectories with accumulations of jumps are exhibited. Examples from mechanics and circuits illustrate some of the results. The link with complementarity dynamical systems and with switching differential-algebraic equations is made.

Keywords

34A6034A3834H1593D0593C30
Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 29 , Special Issue 5: Theory and applications of nonsmooth dynamical systems , October 2018 , pp. 941 - 968
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

[1] Acary, V., Brogliato, B. & Goeleven, D. (2008) Higher order Moreau's sweeping process: Mathematical formulation and numerical simulation. Math. Program. A, 113, 133–217.Google Scholar
[2] Acary, V., Bonnefon, O. & Brogliato, B. (2011) Nonsmooth Modeling and Simulation for Switched Circuits, Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, LNEE 69.Google Scholar
[3] Adly, S., Haddad, T. & Thibault, L. (2014) Convex sweeping process in the framework of measure differential inclusions and evolutional variational inequalities. Math. Program. B, 148, 5–47.Google Scholar
[4] Aubin, J. P. (1990) A survey of viability theory, SIAM J. Control Optim., 28 (4), 749–788.Google Scholar
[5] Ballard, P. (2000) The dynamics of discrete mechanical systems with perfect unilateral constraints. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 154 (3), 199–274.Google Scholar
[6] Benveniste, A., Bourke, T., Caillaud, B. & Pouzet, M. (2012) Non-standard semantics of hybrid systems modelers. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 78 (3), 877–910.Google Scholar
[7] Bernstein, D. S. (2005) Matrix Mathematics. Theory, Facts, and Formulas with Application to Linear Systems Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
[8] Blanchini, F. (1999) Set invariance in control. Automatica, 35, 1747–1767.Google Scholar
[9] Bressan, A. (1959) Incompatibilita dei teoremi di esistenza e di unicita del moto per un tipo molto comune e regolare di sistemi meccanici, Rend. Scu. Norm. di Pisa, 333–348.Google Scholar
[10] Brogliato, B. (2009) Some results on the optimal control with unilateral state constraints. Nonlinear Anal.: Theory, Methods Appl., 70, 3626–3657.Google Scholar
[11] Brogliato, B., Lozano, R., Maschke, B. & Egeland, O. (2007) Dissipative Systems Analysis and Control, Springer Verlag, Communications and Control Eng., London.Google Scholar
[12] Brogliato, B. (2016) Nonsmooth Mechanics. Models, Dynamics and Control, 3rd ed., Springer Int. Publishing, Switzerland.Google Scholar
[13] Brogliato, B. (2018) Non-autonomous higher-order Moreau's sweeping process: Well-posedness, stability and Zeno trajectories. preprint, https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01722772.Google Scholar
[14] Camlibel, M. K., Heemels, W. P. M. H. & Schumacher, J. M. (2002) On linear passive complementarity systems. Eur. J. Control, 8 (3), 220–237.Google Scholar
[15] Colombo, G., Henrion, R. Hoang, N. D. & Mordukhovich, B. S. (2016) Optimal control of the sweeping process over polyhedral controlled sets. J. Differ. Equ., 260, 3397–3447.Google Scholar
[16] Cottle, R. W., Pang, J. S. & Stone, R. E. (1992) The Linear Complementarity Problem, Computer Science and Scientific Computing, Academic Press.Google Scholar
[17] Kinzebulatov, D. (2007) Systems with distributions and viability theorem. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 331, 1046–1067.Google Scholar
[18] Leine, R. I. & van de Wouw, N. (2008) Stability and Convergence of Mechanical Systems with Unilateral Constraints, Vol. 36, Springer Verlag, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
[19] Leine, R. I. & Heimsch, T. F. (2012) Global uniform symptotic attractive stability of the non-autonomous bouncing ball system. Physica D, 241, 2029–2041.Google Scholar
[20] Monteiro Marques, M. D. P. (1993) Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications. In: Differential Inclusions in Nonsmooth Mechanical Problems. Shocks and Dry Friction, Birkhauser, Basel.Google Scholar
[21] Morarescu, C. I. & Brogliato, B. (2010) Trajectory tracking control of multiconstraint complementarity Lagrangian systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 55 (6), 1300–1313.Google Scholar
[22] Moreau, J. J. (1971–1972) Rafle par un convexe variable I, II. Séminaire Anal. Convexe Montpellier, Exposés 15 et 3.Google Scholar
[23] Moreau, J. J. (1977) Evolution problem associated with a moving convex set in a Hilbert space. J. Differ. Equ., 26, 347–374.Google Scholar
[24] Moreau, J. J. (1988) Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: J., J. Moreau & Panagiotopoulos, P. D. (editors), Nonsmooth Mechanics and Applications, CISM Courses and Lectures no 302, Int. Center for Mechanical Sciences, Springer Verlag, Wien, pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
[25] Percivale, D. (1985) Uniqueness in the elastic bounce problem. J. Differ. Equ., 56 (2), 206–215.Google Scholar
[26] Rockafellar, R. T. & Wets, R. J. B. (1998) Variational Analysis, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 317, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
[27] Sannuti, P. (1983) Direct singular perturbation analysis of high gain and cheap control problem. Automatica, 19 (1), 41–51.Google Scholar
[28] Schatzman, M. (1978) A class of nonlinear differential equations of second order in time. Nonlinear Anal., Theory, Methods Appl., 2 (3), 355–373.Google Scholar
[29] Tanwani, A. & Trenn, S. (2017) Determinability and state estimation for switched differential-algebraic equations. Automatica, 76, 17–31.Google Scholar
[30] Thibault, L. (2003) Sweeping process with regular and nonregular sets. J. Differ. Equ., 193 (1), 1–26.Google Scholar