Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:36:15.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter Mitchell. The Donkey in Human History: An Archaeological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 306 pp., 133 illustr., 32 in colour, 6 tables, hbk, ISBN 978-0-19-874923-3)

Review products

Peter Mitchell. The Donkey in Human History: An Archaeological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 306 pp., 133 illustr., 32 in colour, 6 tables, hbk, ISBN 978-0-19-874923-3)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Pauline Hanot
Pauline Hanot*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human HistoryJena, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 595 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bulliet, R.W. 1990. The Camel and the Wheel. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2015. Horse Nations: The Worldwide Impact of the Horse on Indigenous Societies Post-1492. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2017. Why the Donkey Did Not Go South: Disease as a Constraint on the Spread of Equus asinus into Southern Africa. African Archaeological Review, 34: 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-017-9245-3Google Scholar
Ritvo, H. 2007. On the Animal Turn. Daedalus, 136: 118–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2007.136.4.118Google Scholar