Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:12:58.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habemus Legitimacy? The European Commission Opens Public Consultation for a Guidance Document

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2021

Danai PETROPOULOU IONESCU Open the ORCID record for Danai PETROPOULOU IONESCU [Opens in a new window]
Danai PETROPOULOU IONESCU*
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Department of Political Science, Maastricht University Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; email: d.petropoulouionescu@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reports
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 861 - 865
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for instance, the contributions on environmental protection in M Eliantonio, E Korkea-aho and O Stefan (eds), EU Soft Law in the Member States: Theoretical Findings and Empirical Evidence (Oxford, Hart 2021).

2 Council Directive 92 /43 /EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora [1992] OJ L206/7.

3 Commission, “Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC” (2007) <https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/guidance/pdf/guidance_en.pdf> (last accessed 23 June 2021).

4 Commission, “EU competition rules – revision of the Vertical Guidelines” (European Commission Have Your Say n.d.) <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12751-EU-competition-rules-revision-of-the-Vertical-Guidelines_en> (last accessed 23 June 2021); Commission, “Guidance on an EU methodology for the determination of Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) in telecoms regulation” (European Commission Have Your Say n.d.) <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/1500-Guidance-on-an-EU-methodology-for-the-determination-of-Weighted-Average-Cost-of-Capital-WACC-in-telecoms-regulation_en> (last accessed 23 June 2021).

5 See, for instance, the contributions on environmental soft law in Eliantonio et al, supra, note 1; and M Eliantonio and G Lisi, “EU environmental soft law in the Member States: a comparative overview of Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia and the UK” (2020) SoLaR Working Papers <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3656418> (last accessed 23 June 2021).

6 Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Better Regulation: Joining forces to make better laws” (2021) <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/better_regulation_joining_forces_to_make_better_laws_en_0.pdf> (last accessed 23 June 2021).

7 For instance, as discussed in O Stefan, M Avbelj, M Eliantonio, M Hartlapp, E Korkea-aho and N Rubio, “EU soft law in the EU legal order: a literature review” (2019) SoLaR Working Papers <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3346629> (last accessed 23 June 2021).

8 O Stefan, “COVID-19 soft law: voluminous, effective, legitimate? A research agenda” (2020) 5 European Papers 1.

9 Case C-911/19, Fédération bancaire française (FBF) v Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) [2021] ECLI:EU:C:2021:294, Opinion of AG Bobek.

10 Case C-322/88, Salvatore Grimaldi v Fonds des maladies professionnelles [1989] ECLI:EU:C:1989:646; Case C-314/85, Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-Ost [1987] ECLI:EU:C:1987:452.

11 Case C-16/16, Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:79.

12 M Eliantonio and O Stefan, “The elusive legitimacy of EU soft law: an analysis of consultation and participation in the process of adopting COVID-19 soft law in the EU” (2021) 12 European Journal of Risk Regulation 159; D Petropoulou Ionescu and M Eliantonio, “Democratic legitimacy and soft law in the EU legal order: a theoretical perspective” (2021) 17 Journal of Contemporary European Research 43; S Vaughan, “Differentiation and dysfunction: an exploration of post-legislative guidance practices in 14 EU agencies” (2015) 17 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 66; European Parliament, “European Parliament resolution P6_TA(2007)0366 on institutional and legal implications of the use of ‘soft law’” (Resolution) (2007) OJ C187 E/75.