Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
This section discusses the regulation of “lifestyle risks”, a term that can apply to both substances and behaviours. Lifestyle risks take place along the line of “abstinence – consumption – abuse – addiction”. This can concern substances such as food, alcohol or drugs, as well as behaviours such as gambling or sports. The section also addresses the question of the appropriate point of equilibrium between free choice and state intervention (regulation), as well as the question of when risks can be considered to be acceptable or tolerable. In line with the interdisciplinary scope of the journal, the section aims at updating readers on both the regulatory and the scientific developments in the field. It analyses legislative initiatives and judicial decisions and at the same time it provides insight into recent empirical studies on lifestyle risks.
1 European Court of Justice, C-42/07 Santa Casa Luxembourg: ECJ, 2009.
2 R. Hughes and E. Pfanner, “Raids Expose Soccer Fixing Across Europe”, New York Times, 20 November 2009.
3 “Faites vos jeux, en ligne”, Le Monde, 8 June 2010.
4 Y. Bélanger, Y. Boisvert, E. Papineau and H. Vétéré, La Reponsabilité de L'Etat Québécois en Matière de Jeu Pathologiquie: La Gestion des Appareils de Loterie Vidéo (Montréal: Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique . Urbanisation 2003); M. Griffiths, Problem Gambling in Europe: An Overview, available on the Internet at <https://dspace1.acs.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47808/1/Prob_Gamb_Europe_2009.pdf> (last accessed on 1 June 2010).
5 GamblingCompliance, Market Barriers: A European Online Gambling Study 2009 (London: GamblingCompliance 2009), p. 2.Google Scholar
6 Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Study of Gambling Services in the Internal Market of the European Union: Final Report (Lausanne: ISDC 2006), pp. xxvi–xxvii.Google Scholar
7 European Court of Justice, C-67/98 Zanetti, Luxembourg: ECJ, 1999, para. 36.
8 European Court of Justice, C-243/01 Gambelli, Luxembourg: ECJ, 2003, paras. 61 and 62.
9 See Cases European Court of Justice, C-124/97 Läära, C-67/98 Zanetti and C-243/01 Gambelli.
10 Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Study of Gambling Services in the Internal Market of the European Union (Lausanne: ISDC 2006)Google Scholar; Vlaemminck, P. and Hubert, A., Is There Room for a Comprehensive EU Gambling Services Policy? (Prague: Conference 2009)Google Scholar; Doukas, D. and Anderson, J., “Commercial Gambling without Frontiers: When the ECJ Throws, the Dice is Loaded”, in Yearbook of European Law (Oxford: University Press 2008).Google Scholar
11 European Commission Directorate-General Press and Communications, Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-42/07, Press release No 70/09 (Luxembourg: Press and Information, September 8, 2009), p. 2.Google Scholar
12 Idem.
13 Idem.
14 Panel debate, Mr. Vlaemminck (Vlaemminck & Partners) and Mr. Wes Himes (Remote Gambling Association), International Masters of Gaming Law Conference, Amsterdam, September 2009.
15 Available on the Internet at <http://www.gtech.com/products_services/lottery.asp> (last accessed on 1 June 2010).
16 The amounts of money and the strategies to apportion them vary greatly from one country to another.
17 Panel debate, International Masters of Gaming Law Conference, Amsterdam, September 2009.
18 For those interested in these dynamics, you can keep the discussion going on the gambling listserv at <http://www.idheap.ch/gambling>.