Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:24:01.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of political parties to representative democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2014

Ann-Kristin Kölln
Ann-Kristin Kölln*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Public Administration, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
*
*E-mail: ann-kristin.kolln@gu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political parties play a major role in democratic processes around the world. Recent empirical research suggests that parties are increasingly less important to citizens. Simultaneously, classic and contemporary theories of representative democracy specifically still minimally incorporate accounts of party benefit. This article attempts to reconcile normative political theory on democratic representation with party politics literature. It evaluates party democracy’s value in comparison with its next best theoretical alternative – pluralist democracy with individual representatives – along two different paths. It argues that parties are not flawless, but party democracy is preferable over pluralist democracy. Parties increase predictability and the transparency of policy outcomes. This, in turn, facilitates better accountability between voters and their representatives. In addition, parties save politics from becoming a dispersed and even possibly a contradictory set of actions.

Keywords

party democracypluralist democracyrepresentative democracynormative political theory
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 593 - 613
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allern, E.H. and Pedersen, K. (2007), ‘The impact of party organisational change on democracy’, West European Politics 30(1): 68–92.Google Scholar
Anckar, D. and Anckar, C. (2000), ‘Democracies without parties’, Comparative Political Studies 33(2): 225–247.Google Scholar
Andeweg, R. and Thomassen, J. (2005), ‘Modes of political representation: toward a new typology’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(4): 507–528.Google Scholar
Bader, V. (2014), ‘Crisis of political parties and representative democracies: rethinking parties in associational, experimentalist governance’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17(3): 350–376.Google Scholar
Bader, V. and Bonotti, M. (2014), ‘Introduction: parties, partisanship and political theory’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17(3): 253–266.Google Scholar
Barker, D.C. and Carman, C. (2012), Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Masket, S., Noel, H. and Zaller, J. (2012), ‘A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics’, Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–597.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Å. and Wass, H. (2010), ‘Styles of political representation: what do voters expect?’ Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 20(1): 55–81.Google Scholar
Birch, A.H. (2001), The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, 3rd edn., Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonotti, M. (2011), ‘Conceptualising political parties: a normative framework’, Politics 31(1): 19–26.Google Scholar
Carman, C.J. (2006), ‘Public preferences for parliamentary representation in the UK: an overlooked link?’, Political Studies 54(1): 103–122.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J., Farrell, D.M. and McAllister, I. (2011), Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. and Weldon, S.A. (2005), ‘Public images of political parties: a necessary evil?’ West European Politics 28(5): 931–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, L. (2011), ‘Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation’, American Political Science Review 105(1): 100–114.Google Scholar
Disch, L. (2012), ‘Democratic representation and the constituency paradox’, Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 599–616.Google Scholar
Dovi, S. (2008), ‘Political representation’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, P. and Holmberg, S. (1996), Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden, Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, P. and Narud, H.M. (eds) (2013), Between-Election Democracy: The Representative Relationship After Election Day, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gastil, J. (2000), By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (2008), Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, R. and Diamond, L. (2001), ‘Types and functions of parties’, in L. Diamond and R. Gunther (eds), Political Parties and Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar
Jones, P. and Hudson, J. (1998), ‘The role of political parties: an analysis based on transaction costs’, Public Choice 94: 175–189.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1987), ‘Party government and its alternatives’, in R.S. Katz (ed.), Party Governments: European and American Experiences, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Knight, K. (2006), ‘Transformations of the concept of ideology in the twentieth century’, The American Political Science Review 100(4): 619–626.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2003), ‘Political parties and democracy: what sort of future?’, Central European Political Science Review 4: 6–20.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2008), ‘The challenge to party government’, West European Politics 31(1): 211–234.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manin, B., Przeworski, A. and Stokes, S.C. (1999), ‘Introduction’, in A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes and B. Manin (eds), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2011), ‘Clarifying the concept of representation’, American Political Science Review 105(3): 621–630.Google Scholar
Méndez-Lago, M. and Martínez, A. (2002), ‘Political representation in Spain: an empirical analysis of the perception of citizens and MPs’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 8(1): 63–90.Google Scholar
Merelman, R.M. (1969), ‘The development of political ideology: a framework for the analysis of political socialization’, The American Political Science Review 63(3): 750–767.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1869), Considerations on Representative Government, New York, NY: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Müller, W.C. (2000), ‘Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work’, European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 309–333.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2006), ‘A defense of party spirit’, Perspectives on Politics 4(4): 713–727.Google Scholar
Muirhead, R. (2010), ‘Can deliberative democracy be partisan?’, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22(2–3): 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennock, J.R. (1968), ‘Political representation: an overview’, in J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds), Representation, New York, NY: Atherton Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H.F. (1967), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2000), Elections as Instruments of Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S.C. and Manin, B. (eds) (1999), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, A. (2011), ‘The concepts of representation’, American Political Science Review 105(3): 631–641.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. (2008), On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, N. (2014), ‘Partisanship and independence: the peculiar moralism of American politics’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17(3): 267–288.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2006), ‘The Representative Claim’, Contemporary Political Theory 5(3): 297–318.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2008), ‘Making representations: modes and strategies of political parties’, European Review 16(3): 271–286.Google Scholar
Saward, M. (2011), ‘The wider canvas: representation and democracy in state and society’, in S. Alonso, J. Keane and W. Merkel (eds), The Future of Representative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. (1942), Party Government, New York, NY: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Schmitt, H. and Holmberg, S. (1995), ‘Political parties in decline?’, in H.-D. Klingemann and D. Fuchs (eds), Citizens and the State, vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95–133.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strøm, K. (2000), ‘Parties at the core of government’, in R.J. Dalton and M.P. Wattenberg (eds), Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 180–207.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J. and Schmitt, H. (1997), ‘Policy representation’, European Journal of Political Research 32(2): 165–184.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2005), ‘Continuity and rupture: the power of judgment in democratic representation’, Constellations 12(2): 194–222.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006), Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2011), ‘Representative democracy and its critics’, in S. Alonso, J. Keane and W. Merkel (eds), The Future of Representative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–49.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. and Warren, M.E. (2008), ‘The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.Google Scholar
van Biezen, I., Mair, P. and Poguntke, T. (2012), ‘Going, going, gone…? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Biezen, I. and Saward, M. (2008), ‘Democratic theorists and party scholars: why they don’t talk to each other, and why they should’, Perspectives on Politics 6(1): 21–35.Google Scholar
Webb, P. (2002), ‘Conclusion: political parties and democratic control in advanced industrial societies’, in P. Webb, D. Farrell and I. Holliday (eds) Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 438–460.Google Scholar
Wessels, B. (2011), ‘Performance and deficits of present-day representation’, in S. Alonso, J. Keane and W. Merkel (eds), The Future of Representative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 96–123.Google Scholar
White, J. and Ypi, L. (2010), ‘Rethinking the modern prince: partisanship and the democratic ethos’, Political Studies 58(4): 809–828.Google Scholar
White, J. and Ypi, L. (2011), ‘On partisan political justification’, American Political Science Review 105(2): 381–396.Google Scholar