Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T15:40:48.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Automatic attentional processing of faces with disease cues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

S. Soares
Affiliation:
Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Aveiro CINTESIS-UA, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division for Psychology, Sweden, Sweden
A.C. Magalhães
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal
A.F. Oliveira
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal
B. Silva
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal
J. Dias
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal
M.J. Godinho
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal
S. Xavier*
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
J. Ferreira
Affiliation:
University of Aveiro, Department of Education, Aveiro, Portugal Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences IBILI, Coimbra, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Stimuli that are relevant to our survival, especially those that signal the presence of a threat in the environment (e.g., threatening faces), automatically attract our attention.

Objective

The same may be true for faces displaying subtle disease cues as they may signal danger of potential contamination and, hence, disease-avoidance behaviour, which was the focus of the present research.

Aim

The present study investigated, for the first time to our knowledge, whether faces with disease cues (DF), compared to control stimuli (faces without such cues) (CF), interfered with the participants’ performance in a letter discrimination task.

Method

Eighty-six (44 women) university students volunteered to participate in a letter discrimination task where 240 DF and 240 CF were presented.

Results

The results confirmed our hypothesis by showing that for DF, compared to CF, participants took longer to discriminate the target letters. Moreover, the results from a further rating task showed that DF, compared to CF, were rated as significantly more disgusting and associated with disease, thus confirming our experimental manipulation and suggesting that disgust may be driving automatic attention to DF.

Conclusions

Our findings provide important insights on the possible influence of exogenous attention to disease cues in social avoidance behaviour, which may have relevant implications in clinical disorders with disgust at its core.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW434
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.