Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:22:11.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classifications in child and adolescent psychiatry: A risky business?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

Falissard B.*
Affiliation:
Epidemiological Center Research and Population Health, France

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Psychiatrists, like most physicians, are fascinated by their classifications. Like art critics that distinguish surrealists, cubists, hyperrealists, minimalists, etc. psychiatrists try to reveal patterns of symptoms, emotions or behaviors from the patients they see in their day-to-day practice. But psychiatric disorders are not used and determined only by psychiatrists. As pointed by P. Zachar (2015), psychiatric disorders can be considered as biological dysfunction, patterns of symptoms helpful for treatment and prognosis, categories used by health insurances, categories used by judges, words used in the media, concepts used by sociologists (“The weariness of the self”, Alain Eherenberg).We will discuss in the conference what science can say about this confusion and what clinicians should consider for their clinical practice.

Disclosure of interest

The author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.

Type
EECP Training workshop: classification: how many categories do we need?
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.