Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T02:56:08.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of behavioral activation therapy and treatment as usual among depressed patients in secondary psychiatric care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

K. Luoto
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Psychiatry, Tampere, Finland The Hospital District of South Osthrobothnia, Psychiatry, Seinäjoki, Finland
A. Koivukangas
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Psychiatry, Tampere, Finland The Hospital District of South Osthrobothnia, Psychiatry, Seinäjoki, Finland
A. Lassila
Affiliation:
The Hospital District of South Osthrobothnia, Psychiatry, Seinäjoki, Finland
E. Leinonen
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Psychiatry, Tampere, Finland
O. Kampman
Affiliation:
University of Tampere, Psychiatry, Tampere, Finland The Hospital District of South Osthrobothnia, Psychiatry, Seinäjoki, Finland

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence-based brief therapies are needed to reduce a marked heterogeneity affecting treatment of depression within the public psychiatric care. They should be easy to implement and use for a large group of patients.

Objectives

To develop and implement an effective brief treatment protocol for depressed patients treated in public psychiatric secondary care.

Aim

To explore and compare the outcome of depressed patients receiving either behavioral activation therapy (BA) or treatment as usual (TAU).

Methods

Two hundred and forty two depressive patients referred to adult public secondary psychiatric care formed the BA treated study group. The TAU treated control group (n = 205) was collected from the hospital districts database and matched by the hospitalization rate, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All patients received anti-depressive medications. In the study group, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was conducted four times within 24 months follow-up. In both groups, the ability of functioning was controlled by Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF).

Results

In the study group, depressive symptoms alleviated systematically and significantly during follow-up (Table 1). The improvement in GAF scores was significantly better in the study group throughout the follow-up (Table 1).

Conclusions

BA can be implemented and used effectively for depressive patients in public psychiatric secondary care. BA is superior to TAU in terms of functional recovery.

Table 1

1Mean change (decrease) in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) compared to baseline.

2Mean score in Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) during the given follow-up period.

3Within study groups compared to baseline.

4Between groups.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster viewing: Cultural psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.