Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:49:31.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discontinuation vs. continuation treatment with neuroleptics for a better long-term outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

L. Wunderink*
Affiliation:
Friesland Mental Health Services, University Medical Center Groningen, Research & Education, Psychiatry, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
R. Nieboer
Affiliation:
Friesland Mental Health Services, Research and Education, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
F. Nienhuis
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Groningen, Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands
S. Sytema
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Groningen, Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands
D. Wiersma
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Groningen, Psychiatry, Groningen, Netherlands
*
* Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Long-term functional outcome of dose-reduction/discontinuation strategies in first-episode psychosis (FEP) has not been studied before. The present study compared 7-year outcome of an early antipsychotic dose-reduction/discontinuation (DR) strategy with maintenance treatment (MT). Primary outcome was (symptomatic and functional) recovery; relapse rates, functional and symptomatic remission were secondary outcomes.

Methods

FEP patients (n = 128) symptomatically remitted for 6 m during their first treatment year who completed an 18 months trial comparing MT and DR were followed-up at 7 years. Symptomatic remission criteria were adopted from Andreasen et al., functional remission criteria were based on a functioning scale. Recovery was defined as meeting both criteria sets. MT or DR strategy, and baseline parameters were entered in a logistic regression analysis with symptom and functional remission and recovery at 7-years follow-up as dependent variables.

Results

One hundred and three patients consented to participate. DR-patients showed twice the recovery-rate of MT-patients (40% against 18%), odds ratio 3.5 (P = .014). Symptomatic remission-rates were equal (69% and 67%). Better DR recovery-rates were attributable to higher functional remission-rates (46% vs. 20%) in DR. Predictors of recovery were DR, baseline living together and less severe negative symptoms. During the last 2 years of follow-up the mean daily dose in haloperidol equivalents was 2.20 mg in DR vs. 3.60 mg in MT (P = .031).

Relapse rates were initially higher in DR but leveled at 3 years; 61.5% relapsed in DR and 68.6% in MT in 7 years.

Conclusion

DR of antipsychotics during early stages of remitted FEP significantly improved 7-years outcome in terms of recovery and functional remission compared to maintenance treatment. Though initially relapse rates in GD were higher, these equalled those in MT from 3 years to the end of the study. While the necessity of immediate antipsychotic treatment in FEP and positive symptoms relapse is robustly demonstrated in a great number of studies, this study suggests that we are faced with a dilemma concerning the drawbacks of long-term maintenance antipsychotic treatment on functional capacity. Though antipsychotic discontinuation appears only feasible without relapse in a substantial minority of patients, guided dose-reduction as far as positive symptoms remain subsided and allow it, appears a feasible strategy in view of functional recovery, doing justice to both sides of the dilemma.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
S102
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.