Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:32:29.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder: sociodemographic and clinical characterization of a large outpatient cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

B. Benatti*
Affiliation:
1Department of Mental Health, Sacco University Hospital 2Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, Aldo Ravelli Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
N. Girone
Affiliation:
1Department of Mental Health, Sacco University Hospital
M. Vismara
Affiliation:
1Department of Mental Health, Sacco University Hospital
C. Bucca
Affiliation:
1Department of Mental Health, Sacco University Hospital
B. Dell’Osso
Affiliation:
1Department of Mental Health, Sacco University Hospital 2Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, Aldo Ravelli Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and disabling condition characterized by a wide variety of phenotypic expressions. Several studies have reinforced the hypothesis of OCD heterogeneity by proposing subtypes based on predominant symptomatology (Mataix-Cols et al., 2005), course (Tukel et al., 2007), and comorbidities (Mahasuar et al., 2011). Early-onset OCD could be considered a neurodevelopmental subtype of OCD, with evidence of distinct neurocircuits supporting disease progression (Park et al., 2022).

Objectives

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical differences between the early-onset and late-onset subtypes in a large patient cohort.

Methods

Two hundred and eighty patients diagnosed with OCD were consecutively recruited from the OCD Tertiary Clinic at Luigi Sacco University Hospital in Milan. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were analyzed for the entire sample and compared between the two subgroups (EO: early-onset, age <18 years [40%]; LO: late-onset, age ≥ 18 years [60%]).

Results

The EO group showed a higher frequency of male gender (65.5% vs 34.5%, p< .001, see Figure 1a), a higher presence of lifetime psychiatric comorbidities (75.7% vs 24.3%, p =.025), and higher rates of Tic and Tourette disorders (7.2% vs 0%, p=.006) compared to the LO group. Additionally, in the EO subgroup, a longer duration of untreated illness was observed (9.05 ± 10.0 vs 5 ± 7.17; p<.001, see Figure 1b), along with a lower presence of insight (33.3% vs. 66.7%, p =.024). No significant differences emerged in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores between the groups.

Image:

Image 2:

Conclusions

The early-onset OCD subtype highlights a more severe psychopathological profile compared to the late-onset group. Exploring distinct manifestations and developmental trajectories of OCD can contribute to a better definition of homogeneous subtypes, useful for studying risk factors and defining targeted therapeutic strategies for treatment.

Disclosure of Interest

B. Benatti Speakers bureau of: Angelini, Lundbeck, Janssen, Rovi, N. Girone: None Declared, M. Vismara: None Declared, C. Bucca: None Declared, B. Dell’Osso Grant / Research support from: Angelini, Lundbeck, Janssen, Pfizer, Otzuka, Neuraxpharm, and Livanova, Speakers bureau of: Angelini, Lundbeck, Janssen, Pfizer, Otzuka, Neuraxpharm, and Livanova.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.