Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:25:37.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of acute stress on probabilistic reversal learning in healthy participants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

L. Wieland*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
C. Ebrahimi
Affiliation:
Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
T. Katthagen
Affiliation:
Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
M. Panitz
Affiliation:
Neurologie, Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften, Leipzig, Germany
A. Heinz
Affiliation:
Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
Z. Sjoerds
Affiliation:
Institute Of Psychology - Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
F. Schlagenhauf
Affiliation:
Psychiatry And Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Altered reward-based learning and stress play an important role in psychiatric illnesses, such as psychosis or addiction. Stress sometimes increases learning from rewards, other times it does not show an effect (Starcke & Brand, 2016). A task addressing reward-based learning is the reversal learning task, which uses probabilistic rewards as feedback and incorporates sudden changes in reward contingencies. The effects of acute stress on reversal learning have rarely been addressed.

Objectives

Here, we investigated the effect of acute social stress in a within-subject design in healthy participants.

Methods

A sample of n = 28 male non-clinical participants performed the task in a control condition versus the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), a validated method to induce psychosocial stress. In our version of the reversal learning task (Reiter, 2016), participants choose between two anti-correlated stimuli in order to obtain rewards in three blocks. Reward contingencies remain stable for the first 55 trials and the last 35 trials. During the second block, in between the stable blocks, four changes of reward contingencies require participants to flexibly adapt their behavior. Performance was measured in correct responses, switches after losses and wins.

Results

Cortisol and subjective stress responses showed that the stress induction was successful. Preliminary analyses showed no significant effect of stress induction on any of the performance measures.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that reversal learning, at least regarding overall performance measures in our task, is robust to stress-related changes. Modeling and fMRI analyses could yield further insights into more subtle changes after stress induction.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.