Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:38:23.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0738 – Family Functioning in Families of First-Episode Patients in Comparison to Chronic Patients and Healthy Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

K. Koutra
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
M. Basta
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
T. Roumeliotaki
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Z. Stefanakis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
S. Triliva
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
C. Lionis
Affiliation:
Department of Social Medicine Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
A.N. Vgontzas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Research focused on the intrafamilial environment of people experiencing their first episode of psychosis (FEP) is limited.

Objectives:

To investigate possible differences in family environment between FEP patients, chronic psychotic patients and healthy controls.

Aims:

To compare family variables between relatives of FEP patients, chronic patients and healthy controls.

Methods:

Family cohesion and flexibility (FACES-IV) and psychological well-being (GHQ-28) were evaluated in relatives of 50 FEP patients, 50 chronic patients and 50 controls, whereas expressed emotion (FQ) and family burden (FBS) were assessed between the two clinical groups.

Results:

Multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for several confounding variables revealed statistically significant differences in the total ratio for family cohesion and flexibility between the three groups indicating poorer family functioning for chronic families as compared to FEP families (β coefficient −0.47, 95% CI: −0.77, −0.18) and lower scores for FEP families as compared to controls (β coefficient −0.59, 95% CI: −0.81, −0.37). Chronic families scored significantly higher in critical comments (β coefficient 7.17, 95% CI: 3.45, 10.89), and reported higher subjective (β coefficient 2.85, 95% CI: 0.69, 5.01) and objective burden (β coefficient 8.25, 95% CI: 4.67, 11.84) as compared to FEP families. Non-significant differences were found in psychological well-being between FEP and chronic families, whereas FEP families reported higher levels of psychological distress as compared to controls.

Conclusions:

Having a family member with a major psychiatric disorder is a general stressor for families and family interventions should be considered to minimize disruption to family life.

Type
FC13 - Free Communications Session 13: Mental Health
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.