Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:54:27.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0818 - Maintenance rtms Treatment for Resistant Depressed Patients: A one-year Double Blind Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

R. Benadhira
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
S. Braha
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
N. Bouaziz
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
V. Moulier
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
R. Isaac
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
S. Regat
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France
D. Januel
Affiliation:
93G03, EPS VILLE-EVRARD, Neuily sur Marne, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe and highly prevalence disease with potentially life threatening illness and high level of morbidity and mortality. Traditional pharmacological strategies are not always sufficiently effective and side effects are not rare and may be the cause of discontinuation, particularly in the long-term treatment.

Objective:

rTMS could be an alternative strategy for long-term treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Aim:

to evaluate the efficency of maintenance rTMS in a one-year double blind randomized controlled study for TRD patients.

Method:

55 TRD patients were involved in a single site trial with two phases: an acute phase (phase I) in which all the participants received active high-frequency stimulation during 4 blocks of five consecutive working days (Monday to Friday) in an open-label design and a maintenance phase (phase II) in which responders (> 49% HDRS-17 reduction from baseline) were randomized in two arms with sham or active highfrequency rTMS maintenance treatment for the eleven following months.

Results:

of 55 patients in the acute trials, 33 were responders and 14 accepted to be included in the phase II. Delta HDRS score show a significantly difference for M1-M4 (p=.003), M1-M5 (p=.004) and M1-M6 (p=.043) between the active and the placebo group.

Conclusion:

rTMS could be a novel strategy to prevent relapse in TRD patients who respond to an acute rTMS treatment and 1 session per week may be able to prevent relapses. These results need to be confirmed in a larger sample.

Type
FC08 - Free Communications Session 08: Treatment
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.