Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T01:17:52.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-0994 – Assessing Adhd Stimulant Treatment Efficacy Using the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale: Strengths and Weaknesses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Soutullo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
T. Banaschewski
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
M. Lecendreux
Affiliation:
Paediatric Sleep Centre and National Reference Centre for Orphan Diseases: Narcolepsy Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Kleine-Levin Syndrome, Robert-Debré University Hospital, Paris, France
M. Johnson
Affiliation:
Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
A. Zuddas
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
P. Hodgkins
Affiliation:
Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Shire Development LLC, Wayne, USA
B. Adeyi
Affiliation:
Global Biostatistics, Shire Development LLC, Wayne, USA
L.A. Squires
Affiliation:
Global Clinical Development and Innovation, Shire Development LLC, Wayne, USA
D.R. Coghill
Affiliation:
Division of Neuroscience, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale–Parent Report (WFIRS-P) is an ADHD-specific instrument comprising 50 items, grouped into six domains. Parents score each item on a Likert scale (0–3 or not applicable).

Objective:

To evaluate functional impairment using the WFIRS-P in two phase 3 studies (SPD489-325 and SPD489-326) of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children and adolescents with ADHD.

Methods:

Patients’ parents or guardians completed WFIRS-P assessments at baseline, and weeks 4 and 7 of SPD489-325, a 7-week, randomized, placebo controlled trial incorporating a reference treatment (osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate; OROS-MPH). Statistical comparison of LDX versus OROS-MPH was not pre-specified. In SPD489-326, WFIRS-P assessments were performed in the ≥26-week open-label period and the subsequent 6-week randomized-withdrawal period.

Results:

In SPD489-325, statistically significant placebo-adjusted effects of LDX were observed in WFIRS-P total score (effect size, 0.924; p<0.001) and in Family, Learning and School, Social Activities and Risky Activities; OROS-MPH effects were significant in total score (effect size 0.772; p<0.001) and in all domains. In SPD489-326, scores were improved or stable in the open-label period. In the randomized-withdrawal period, total score and all domain scores were stable in the LDX group, but worsened in the placebo group. LDX was significantly more effective than placebo in Family, Learning and School, Risky Activities and in total score (effect size, 0.908; p<0.001).

Conclusions:

Short-term treatment with LDX or OROS-MPH led to improved functional impairment scores. These benefits were maintained during long-term LDX treatment, and scores declined following treatment withdrawal.

Supported by funding from Shire.

Type
S537 - Effectiveness of stimulant treatment in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: functional, health-related quality of life and health utility outcome measures
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.