Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:32:34.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1135 – Psychotherapy Focused on Psychic Representation (PFPR)for Borderline Personality Disorders. rct Results.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

B. Reneses
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatría, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria. IdISSC, Universidad Complutense
M. Galian
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatría, Hospital Clínico San Carlos., Madrid, Spain
R. Serrano
Affiliation:
Ayuntamiento de Madrid, Area de Salud Pública., Madrid, Spain
D. Figuera
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatría, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria. IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
A. Fernandez del Moral
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatría, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria. IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
M. Fuentes
Affiliation:
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria. IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
M. De los Reyes
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
T. Montalvo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
M. Trujillo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, New York University. Bellvue Hospital, New York, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Psychotherapy Focused on Psychic Representation (PFPR) is a new time limited dynamic psychotherapy for the treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. It is a manualized psychodynamic technique based on brief psychoanalytic psychotherapies principles and designed to be applied in the framework of public care services. A randomized and controlled study with a sample of 53 patients was conducted to assess PFPR's efficacy. We are reporting the final results at the end of treatment and at the 6 and 12 months of follow up.

Methods:

Both groups, the experimental (n=25) and control group (n=28) received treatment as usual. The experimental group received 20 additional PFPR sessions performed by four therapists with homogenous characteristics, specifically trained in this technique. The main outcome variables measures were: Severity global index of SCL-90-R, Barrat Impulsivity Scale scores and Social Adaptation (SASS score). Baseline and conditions at the end of treatment and at the 6 and 12 months of follow up period were compared.

Results and Conclusions:

Results showed significantly better outcomes for the experimental group in all main variables and in most of the secondary ones at the end of treatment. At 6 months follow up, the significant differences remain in level of impulsivity and some other secondary variables. At 12 months follow up the experimental group shows better results in all variables but only depressive symptoms measurement remains significant.

Type
P29 - Psychotherapy
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.