Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:58:50.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1626 – Theory of Mind at Chronically Depressed Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Jakob
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
M.C. Mauer
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
A. Jobst
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
N. Sarubin
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
C. Bauriedl-Schmidt
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
L. Sabaß
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
A. Letters
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
C. Wink
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
C. Selberdinger
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
P. Falkai
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
F. Padberg
Affiliation:
Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, Psychiatric Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Chronically depressed patients show considerably impaired interpersonal features, which could be explained by a reduced Theory of Mind (ToM) ability.

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine whether chronically depressed patients are impaired in their ToM performance compared to a healthy control group in three different components of ToM: the social cognitive and social perceptual component as well as the ability to take someone else's visual perspective.

Methods

32 chronically depressed patients (DSM-IV) were compared to 32 matched healthy controls. ToM abilities were assessed by a cartoon picture story test (CT), the ‘Perspective task’ (PT) and the ‘Reading the mind in the Eyes’ test (RMET). In addition, information about depression severity, childhood trauma and executive functioning (working and logical memory) was assessed for both groups.

Results

Patients mentalized significantly less frequently than healthy controls in the CT (Mann-Whitney-U=340,50, p<0,05). Furthermore, the CT was significantly correlated with the RMET (patients: r=0,46, p<0,05; controls: r=0,57, p<0,01). We didn’t find any significant difference between both groups in the RMET (p>0,05). In the PT, patients showed significantly lower scores than controls (t(35,68)=2,10, p<0,05). There wasn’t any significant correlation between the three ToM tests and severity of depression, duration of illness or childhood trauma (p>0,05).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that chronically depressed patients show deficits in their social cognitive ToM ability compared to controls, whereas their social perceptual ToM ability seems to be unimpaired. As to the capacity to take someone else's perspective, our results suggest that chronically depressed patients present significant deficits.

Type
E02 - e-Poster Oral Session 02: Depression and Suicide
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.