Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T04:59:51.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of executive dysfunction in clinical practice- pragmatic challenges and solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

D. Vasile*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Emergency Central Military Hospital Dr. Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
O. Vasiliu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University Emergency Central Military Hospital Dr. Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Executive dysfunction (ED) is an important clinical dimension that need to be evaluated in neurologic and psychiatric disorders, due to this factor’s impact over patients functionality, quality of life, and overall prognosis. Working memory, inhibition, set shifting, and fluency are the most widely accepted dimensions of ED. The evaluation of these aspects in clinical practive should be more frequently implemented, because they may offer an image about the patients ability to cope with new situations, stressful events, social challenges being included.

Objectives

To determine the most appropriate methods of ED evaluation in psychiatric practice.

Methods

A literature review was conducted through main electronic databases, and papers published between January 2000 and August 2020 were included in the analysis.

Results

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery, Cambridge Neuropsychological Automated Battery (CANTAB), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) have been the most frequently cited instruments for ED evaluation. The neuropsychiatric disorders in which ED was recommended in clinical trials were schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, neurocognitive disorders, bipolar disorders, and major depressive disorders. An integrated approach, that combines initial evaluation and periodic monitoring of symptoms severity, global functioning, quality of life, and ED severity should be considered standard-of-practice for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Conclusions

ED is an important dimension of clinical evaluation in many psychiatric disorders that is useful because the results may correlate to the patients prognosis, quality of life, and overall functional evolution.

Conflict of interest

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.