Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T10:39:19.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incapacity to decide in liaison psychiatry: Analysis of sample of patients admitted in somatic departments of a general hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Nascimento*
Affiliation:
Hospital Professor Dr. Fernando Fonseca- EPE, psychiatry, Amadora, Portugal
F. Vicente
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, psychiatry, Lisbon, Portugal
C. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, psychiatry, Lisbon, Portugal
N. Silva
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, psychiatry, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
C. Vieira
Affiliation:
Hospital Professor Dr. Fernando Fonseca- EPE, psychiatry, Amadora, Portugal
A. Luís
Affiliation:
Hospital Professor Dr. Fernando Fonseca- EPE, psychiatry, Amadora, Portugal
T. Maia
Affiliation:
Hospital Professor Dr. Fernando Fonseca- EPE, psychiatry, Amadora, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Decision capacity (DC) is a complex construct, whose assessment poses huge challenges to Liaison Psychiatrist (LP).

Objectives/aims

Assess factors related to DC in patients with somatic disorders admitted in medical and surgical departments of a general hospital.

Methods

Clinical records of patients who were submitted to a DC assessment at Hospital Fernando Fonseca (Portugal), from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Collected data were statistically analysed with SPSS®. Univariable analysis was performed, in order to determine factors related to DC.

Results

Data from 35 patients subject to DC evaluation were considered, of whom 42.4% were considered unable to give consent to medical and/or surgical procedures. Most of these assessments were related to patients who refused treatment. Patients unable to decide were predominantly male and mainly affected by organic mental or neurocognitive disorders (P < 0.05). There were no statistical significant differences in the age of those considered able or unable to decide. After PL intervention, 40% of those considered unable to decide changed their decision. However, it was not significantly related to the ability to give consent.

Conclusions

Neurocognitive disorders are common diagnosis found in patients admitted in somatic departments with no DC. Frequent change in decision after LP intervention may reflect not only cognitive fluctuations, but also a possible influence of LP intervention on patients’ choices. Appropriate standardized measures are useful tools in assessing patients with cognitive impairment, reducing evaluation differences between professionals, and in order to increase LP decisions credibility.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV428
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.