Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T04:54:49.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indication of depot antipsychotic treatment in the view of slovak psychiatrists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Zelman*
Affiliation:
Psychiatricka Nemocnica, Hronovce, Slovakia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With the increasing number of atypical antipsychotics in depot form, there emerges question about plus and cons of their use in schizophrenia patients. We focused on the opinion of Slovak psychiatrists about use of this treatment in some specific situations of schizophrenia treatment. Research was realized via questionnaire on psychiatrists (n = 47) from ambulant and hospital care, during one conference in June 2015. First part of the questionnaire was focused on the preference of oral or depot form of antipsychotic treatment. Depot form would be indicated by psychiatrists (in more than 89%) when low compliance, anosognosia or frequent episodes. On the contrary, oral antipsychotic treatment is preferred in young patients or employed patients. The type of symptoms (e.g. positive, negative) has relatively small impact on the preference of treatment, where the preferences of each type were the lowest (fewer than 36%). According to the opinion of psychiatrists, depot antipsychotic treatment is not suitable in first episode of disorder (according to 81% of respondents), otherwise in second or third episode it would not be chosen by 6% of asked psychiatrists.

From the aspects of the choice between atypical or typical depot, atypical antipsychotics in depot form were favored when presence of adverse reactions (80%), occurrence of negative symptoms (65%) and short duration of disorder (58%). Typical depot was preferred by psychiatrists in patients with chronic states.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV1055
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.