Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:56:34.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of treatment modality on long-term neurocognitive functioning in treatment resistant bipolar depressed inpatients treated with pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

J. Bjorke-Bertheussen*
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Psychiatry, Stavanger, Norway
B. Auestad
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Research Department, Stavanger, Norway
U. Kessler
Affiliation:
Haukeland University Hospital, Psychiatry, Bergen, Norway
H. Schoyen
Affiliation:
Stavanger University Hospital, Psychiatry, Stavanger, Norway
*
* Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Bipolar depression is difficult to manage, and causes considerable disability and distress for patients and their surroundings. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment, but there are concerns regarding long-term neurocognitive impairment, and in particular autobiographical memory.

Objectives

To compare the long-term effects of algorithm-based pharmacologic treatment (APT) and ECT in treatment-resistant bipolar depression as measured with standard neurocognitive tests and autobiographical memory interview.

Aims

To examine the long-term neurocognitive effects of ECT.

Methods

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial 73 in-patients with treatment resistant bipolar depression were randomized to either APT or unilateral ECT. Patients were assessed at baseline and at 6 months. Neurocognitive functions were assessed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) and the Autobiographical Memory Inventory - Short form (AMI-SF). At 6 months, neurocognitive data were available for 26 patients (APT n = 11, ECT n = 15).

Results

There were no group-differences at baseline.

At 6 months, there was no group-difference in MCCB-score (APT 44.9 vs. ECT 46.0, P-value: 0.707), or WASI total IQ-score (APT 103.9 vs. ECT 107.2, P-value: 0.535). There were indications of (P-value: 0.109) poorer AMI-SF consistency score in the ECT group (APT 72.3% vs. ECT 64.3%).

Conclusions

This study does not find that ECT causes long-term impairment in neurocognitive function as measured with standard neuropsychological tests. We find a trend towards poorer autobiographical memory in the ECT-group, and there needs to be further research regarding this.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV157
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.