Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T05:57:15.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mutual aid program among adults with mental health illness as part of the treatment in a day hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Guerrero Jiménez*
Affiliation:
University Hospital San Cecilio, Psychiatry, Granada, Spain
C.M. Carrillo de Albornoz Calahorro
Affiliation:
University Hospital San Cecilio, Psychiatry, Granada, Spain
J.A. Rodrigo Manzano
Affiliation:
Santa Ana Hospital, Mental Health, Psychologist, Motril, Spain
B.M. Girela Serrano
Affiliation:
Santa Ana Hospital, Mental Health Service, Motril, Spain
*
* Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction/objectives

To supervise agents in a mutual aid experience in Motril Mental Health Day Hospital. To perform a supporting role among the agents involved in a mutual aid program to consolidate its operations autonomously.

Methods

A multidisciplinary working group, which met every two weeks for 4 months was set. Group sessions were planned. We selected mutual aid pairs individually and addressed the difficulties in the process. The experiment was performed with 4 agents setting a maximum of 5 interviews. A success criterion of 80% of the meetings planned was established. In between mutual aid group, success criterion was to maintain a 3-month experience held by 5 members. A qualitative analysis of most important issues amongst coordination meetings were also held.

Results

Three out of 4 pairs reached 80% of the interviews successfully. The support group was developed weekly during 3 months with an average of 8 participants. The trending topics during coordination meetings were toxic consumption, acute crisis, drug intake and issues to be addressed with the psychiatrist.

Conclusions

Mutual aid among users is a way of intervention that needs to be further consolidated. The establishment is still unpretentious and has low weight amongst coordination objectives. The results addressed in number of sessions and satisfaction are favorable, but it is necessary to assess the experience widely and to begin developing specific objectives [1,2].

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV1112
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016

References

Shepherd, G. Making recovery a reality. 2008 Sainsbury Centre for Mental HealthGoogle Scholar
Farkas, M. The vision of recovery today: what it is and what it means for services. World Psychiatry 2007; 6: 410Google ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.