Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T10:35:58.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New interferon-free therapies on HCV+ chronic hepatitis: Overcoming psychiatric side effects in a real world setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Moneglia*
Affiliation:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, department of neuroscience- psychology- drug research and child health, Florence, Italy
A. Santangelo
Affiliation:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, department of neuroscience- psychology- drug research and child health, Florence, Italy
A. Ballerini
Affiliation:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, department of neuroscience- psychology- drug research and child health, Florence, Italy
V. Ricca
Affiliation:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, department of neuroscience- psychology- drug research and child health, Florence, Italy
A.L. Zignego
Affiliation:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, center for systemic manifestations of hepatitis viruses MASVE- department of experimental and clinical medicine, Florence, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Interferon-alpha (IFNα) was the backbone therapy for HCV+ related chronic hepatitis (CH-C). However, it was associated with significant neuropsychiatric side effects and impaired health-related quality of life. Second Generation IFNα-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) seem to be associated with fewer side effects, better tolerability, high efficacy rates and better patient reported outcomes (PROs) [Younoussi, 2014].

Aims

To describe the neuropsychiatric symptoms and PROs during Second Generation DAAs plus ribavirin oral treatment in a group of CH-C real world patients.

Methods

Nineteen CH-C outpatients, scheduled for IFNα-free treatment, were assessed at enrolment (T0), at 4 (T1) and at 12 (T2) weeks, the end of treatment, by means of MDRS, HAM-D, HAM-A, MRS, Y-BOCS and SF-36. A pharmacological therapy, based on clinical evidence, was provided at psychiatric symptoms onset.

Results

During the treatment, we didn’t report any worsening in the administred psychometric scales. Furthermore, we observed a general improvement at week 12 (T2), statistically significant only for MRS (P < 0.05). Any statistically significant difference was found for SF-36 mean scores comparing T0, T1 and T2. However, SF-36 cluster analysis showed between T0 and T2 a meaningful and significant rise of global health clusters “General health perceptions” (P < 0.05), “Change in overall health status” (P < 0.001) and a significant impairment in cluster “Emotional role functioning” (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our real world data are consistent with trial setting results [Younoussi, 2014]. Contrary to previous IFNα-based therapy, new regimens don’t seem to be associated with psychiatric side effects and suggest an immediate gain in general health PROs over the treatment period.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV427
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.