Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T14:51:01.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Novel, Very Short Questionnaire As a Screening Tool For Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

K. Pękala
Affiliation:
Medical University of Lodz, Medical Psychology, Lodz, Poland
T. Sobow*
Affiliation:
Medical University of Lodz, Medical Psychology, Lodz, Poland
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Self-assessment tools are frequently used as screening tools for depression. However, they are usually long and time-consuming.

Aim of the study

To assess specificity, sensitivity and overall accuracy of a novel, very short, 5 questions tool.

Subjects and methods

The questionnaire consists of 3 phenomenological (based on main symptoms of depression) and 2 questions to assess functional impact of the symptoms. One hundred and ninety patients diagnosed clinically as having major depression (according to ICD-10 criteria and with the help of MINI tool) filled the questionnaire in twice, during episode and remission.

Results

At least two (out of three possible) “yes” answers to phenomenological questions and both two “yes” functional answers yielded 100% specificity (no person in remission). At least one “yes” answer to phenomenological questions and both “yes” answers to functional question yielded 82.8% specificity, 83.7% sensitivity and 83,3% overall accuracy. These results varied insignificantly in subgroups with different depression severity.

Conclusion

A short, 5-question questionnaire may be used as a screening tool for depression. Specificity, sensitivity and overall accuracy are above 80% largely independently of depression severity.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV544
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.