Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:24:44.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patients with anxiety disorders: Pathways of care and their outcomes in Germany – A secondary data analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

J. Zielasek
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Duesseldorf, Germany
W. Gaebel
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Duesseldorf, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental disorders in Germany. Different sectors and disciplines participate in mental healthcare of these patients, but there is a lack of empirical evidence of the treatment outcomes in different settings.

Objectives

The study focuses on analyzing the care pathways of patients with anxiety disorders and the effects of such pathways on critical events like sick leave, early retirement and mortality.

Aims

The analysis aims at developing recommendations for optimizing treatment with a view to minimize the rate of occurrence of critical events during the care pathway.

Methods

Secondary data of three statutory health insurance companies and of the German Pension Funds of the years 2005–2007. The analyses are based on 744,742 persons with at least one diagnosis of an anxiety disorder.

Results

The analyses reveal a low rate of changes between primary and specialized care. There was a high number of care pathways (n = 2.608).The most common type was care by primary care physicians/somatic specialists only (60.5% of patients), followed by a treatment by a psychiatrist only (9.5%). Patients, who were only treated by general practitioners/somatic specialists, had significantly lower rates of sick leave and early retirement. This may indicate that cases with more favourable prognoses are found with this care pathway.

Conclusions

Analyses of care pathways using secondary data can contribute to identify potential for optimizing mental health care services and provide information about intersectoral interface problems, which should be considered in the quality management of mental healthcare.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW322
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.