Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:34:50.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predictors of functioning in major depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Serra-Blasco
Affiliation:
Institut de Recerca Parc Taulí-I3PT, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
E. Aguilar
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
M. Vicent
Affiliation:
Institut d’investigació biomèdica Sant Pau IIB-Sant Pau, psychiatry, Barcelona, Spain
G. Navarra
Affiliation:
Institut de Recerca Parc Taulí-I3PT, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
M.J. Portella
Affiliation:
Institut d’investigació biomèdica Sant Pau IIB-Sant Pau, psychiatry, Barcelona, Spain
A. Sánchez
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
L. Ros
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
S. Acebillo
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
G. Lahera
Affiliation:
Príncipe de Asturias university hospital, psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
D. Palao
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain
N. Cardoner
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, psychiatry, Sabadell, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Life functioning difficulties are a relevant but undervalued consequence of major depression. Mood symptoms and cognitive deficits have a significant, and somehow independent, impact on them. Therefore, cognitive difficulties should be considered a potential target to improve patients’ functioning.

Aims

To examine the degree in which objective and subjective cognition explain functional outcome.

Objectives

To assess objective cognitive function (CF) with a neuropsychological battery and to measure subjective CF using measures of cognitive perception.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients with depression were assessed by age, sex and level of schooling. Depressive symptoms severity was measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Objective CF consisted in the following cognitive domains: memory, attention, executive functioning and processing speed. Subjective CF was assessed with Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D). Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) was used to evaluate life functioning, excluding the cognitive domain. All the listed measures were included in a multiple regression analysis with FAST scores as dependent variable.

Results

The regression model was significant (F1,98 = 67.484, P < 0.001) with an R of 0.825. The variables showing statistical power included (from higher to lower β-coefficient) HDRS-17 (β = 0.545, t = 8.453, P < 0.001), PDQ-D (β = 0.383, t = 6.047, P < 0.001) and DSST (β = −0.123, t = −1.998, P = 0.049).

Conclusions

The severity of depressive symptoms is the variable that best explains life functioning. Surprisingly, the second factor hindering it is the patients’ perception of their cognition. Current findings highlight the importance of correcting cognitive bias in order to improve functionality. However, results have to be taken cautiously as mood symptoms could partly explain the bias.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster Walk: Depression - part 3 and obsessive-compulsive disorder
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.