Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:48:31.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Properties of a coding system for traumatic memories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

C. Soberón
Affiliation:
Complutense university-psychology school, clinical psychology, Madrid, Spain
M. Crespo
Affiliation:
Complutense university-psychology school, clinical psychology, Madrid, Spain
M. Gómez-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Complutense university-psychology school, clinical psychology, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Narrative studies have focused on the language used by the individuals to describe stressful or traumatic experiences. Hence, linguistic procedures have been applied aiming to obtain information about autobiographical memories and trauma processing. However, there is a general lack of agreement about how to measure narrative aspects. Software programs for this purpose are limited, since they don’t capture the language context, and systems based on judge's rates are not free of subjective biases.

Objectives

This study presents a coding system developed to analyze several language categories related to traumatic memories and psychological processes. Structural aspects (e.g., coherence) and content dimensions of traumatic narratives (e.g., emotional or cognitive processes) are measured. Each narrative aspect is coded by raters using both dichotomous (presence/absence) and numerical values (Likert scale).

Aims

To propose a structured coding system for traumatic narratives that considers the language context and maximizes consensus among different raters.

Methods

Traumatic narratives from 50 traumatized women and stressful narratives from 50 non-traumatized women have been evaluated according the system developed. Three blind raters coded each narrative.

Results

Inter-rater reliability data are provided for the different narrative categories. The agreement between raters is discussed for both structural and content language domains.

Conclusions

The analysis of the inter-rater reliability allows exploring subjective biases in assessing different structural and content language dimensions. This study advances in the development of a procedure to analyze autobiographical narratives in a valid and reliable way, with a special focus on traumatic and other unpleasant memories.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW478
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.