Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:01:06.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk for Suicide Among the Elderly: Is the Geriatric Depression Scale a Useful Screening Tool?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

J. Wancata
Affiliation:
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria
B. Marquart
Affiliation:
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria
F. Friedrich
Affiliation:
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria
G. Cerny
Affiliation:
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Depression is among the main risk factors for suicide. The Geriatric Depressions Scale (GDS-30, GDS-15) is depression screening instrument specifically developed for the elderly.

Objectives and aims

To provide a systematic review of the screening accuracy of both GDS versions.

Methods

An electronic search was performed using Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Psyndex and Cochrane library. The selection and examination of papers was done by two reviewers independently. The following studies were excluded: number of depression cases less than 10, no clear case criterion, phone version, psychiatric samples.

Results

Of 173 papers which were read and examined, only 42 papers were included. For both GDS versions similar mean validity indices were found (GDS-30: sensitivity 0.753, specificity 0.770; GDS-15: sensitivity 0.805, specificity 0.750). Using pooled samples we could not find significant differences between the two versions of the GDS. Using comparative studies based on identical samples, both GDS versions showed significantly better validity indices than the “Yale-1-question” screen, but did not differ from the CES-D. Frequently, essential information about research methods was not given. When methods were reported, the differing methods (e.g. concerning blinding, cut-off values, sampling procedures) limit the comparability of primary studies.

Conclusions

In general, the GDS seems to be sufficient for depression screening. While early recognition of depression is essential for identifying persons at risk for suicide, the GDS does not explicitly focus on this problem.

Type
S03-04
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.