Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:58:32.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Treatment-induced mania in bipolar depression: Identifying at-risk bipolar patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Brichant-Petitjean*
Affiliation:
Hôpital Fernand-Widal, 75010Paris, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The treatment of bipolar depression is still an important challenge for clinicians and the number of evidence based options is limited. Antidepressants are the most frequently prescribed drugs for bipolar depression in clinical practice, even though the relative risks and benefits of using this treatment strategy has been strongly debated over the past 25 years. One of the reasons is that several placebo-controlled studies have shown that antidepressants could induce manic or hypomanic episodes and accelerate the rate of cycling, worsening the course of the illness by increasing the number of mood episodes over time. Antidepressant-Induced Manias (AIM) have been reported in a subgroup of about 25 to 30% of bipolar patients. There is an increased risk of mood switch with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). The occurrence of mania during antidepressant treatment is a crucial issue in the clinical management of Bipolar Disorder (BD) since it greatly interferes with the establishment of an optimal treatment for bipolar depression. It can have substantial negative impact on overall mood and psychosocial stability in patients receiving treatment for bipolar depression, possibly leading to treatment resistance. Therefore, the identification of clinical correlates associated with AIM is essential to better identify at-risk subgroups of patients and propose specific individualized treatment strategies for bipolar depression. No risk factors has been replicated so far, mostly because studies are characterized by small sample sizes and by the absence of a consensus definition of AIM, showing conflicting results. In this study, patients were classified according to a restrictive definition, similar to that used by Rousseva et al. (2003). An AIM− group (n = 135) was compared to AIM+ patients (n = 75) for clinical and sociodemographic factors as well as for psychological dimensions.

Type
Session thématique: Le DSM-5 – les principales nouveautés
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013

References

Further readings

Baldessarini, RJVieta, ECalabrese, JRTohen, MBowden, CL.Bipolar depression: overview and commentary. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2010;18(3):143–57.10.3109/10673221003747955CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frye, MAHelleman, GMcElroy, SLAltshuler, LLBlack, DOKeck, PE Jr, et al.Correlates of treatment-emergent mania associated with antidepressant treatment in bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatr 2009;166(2):164–72.10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseva, AHenry, Cvan den Bulke, DFournier, GLaplanche, J-LLeboyer, M, et al.Antidepressant-induced mania, rapid cycling and the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism. Pharmacogenomics J 2003;3(2):101–4.10.1038/sj.tpj.6500156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valentí, MPacchiarotti, IBonnín, CMRosa, ARPopovic, DNivoli, AMA, et al.Risk factors for antidepressantrelated switch to mania. J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(2):271–6.10.4088/JCP.11m07166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.