Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:23:03.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of pharmacotherapies for treatment resistant depression in finland: A nationwide cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

H. Taipale*
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
M. Lähteenvuo
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
A. Tanskanen
Affiliation:
Department Of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
S. Rannanpää
Affiliation:
Janssen-cilag, Janssen-Cilag, Espoo, Finland
J. Tiihonen
Affiliation:
Department Of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

There is a lack of knowledge on utilized pharmacotherapies for treatment resistant depression (TRD).

Objectives

To investigate the courses of treatment of TRD.

Methods

All patients aged 16-65 years and diagnosed with depression in Finland during 2004-2016 were included (identified from nationwide registers for inpatient and specialized outpatient care, sick leaves and disability pensions). New antidepressant users were identified with six-month washout period and followed up for two years to observe the possible emergence of TRD, which was defined as initiation of a third treatment after having two failed pharmacological treatments with adequate duration. Pharmacological treatments were analyzed using PRE2DUP-method.

Results

During follow-up, 177,144 persons had their first registered depression (mean age:39.5, 62.5% women). Of them, 10.9% (N=19,322) met TRD criteria. Among the TRD patients, most common first and second lines antidepressants were as follows: SSRIs (44.6%), mirtazapine (19.0%) and SNRIs (16.5%). As the third line of treatment, 44.2% of TRD patients had antidepressant monotherapy, 32.1% a combination of ≥2 antidepressants, 15.8% antipsychotic or mood stabilizer augmentation and an antidepressant, 4.9% both combination of antidepressants and an augmentation with a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic, 2.7% antipsychotic or mood stabilizer monotherapy and 0.3% ECT monotherapy. Of TRD patients, 36.2% (N=6985) progressed to the fourth line of treatment and most common treatments were antidepressant monotherapy (37.5%), antidepressant combinations (30.8%) and augmentation (20.3%).

Conclusions

Although antidepressant combination and augmentation strategies became more frequent, antidepressant monotherapies were still the most common third and fourth lines of depression treatment.

Disclosure

The study was funded by Janssen and SR is an employee of Janssen.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.