Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:45:07.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of the insomnia assessment scale – adapted in a community sample of portuguese pregnant women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

M. Marques
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Psychiatry, Coimbra, Portugal
A.T. Pereira*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
J. Azevedo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
S. Xavier
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
E. Bento
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
M.J. Soares
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
V. Freitas
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
A. Macedo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine - University of Coimbra, Psychological Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Psychiatry, Coimbra, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Pregnancy is characterized by important changes in sleep and some of them (as insomnia) predict negative outcomes, like depression, through all the perinatal period. There are few Portuguese adapted and validated instruments assessing insomnia in pregnancy.

Objective

To validate the Insomnia Assessment Scale in a sample of Portuguese pregnant women.

Methods

419 pregnant women (mean age: 32.51 ± 4.759; weeks of gestation: 17.32 ± 4.803) answered the Insomnia Assessment Scale (IAS), constructed according to the DSM-V and the ICSD-3 criteria and presenting fourteen items: three evaluating insomnia symptoms (1 to 3); one assessing if sleep difficulties were present although there were adequate conditions to sleep (item 4); one assessing if sleep difficulties occurred three times/week (item 5); one evaluating if sleep was not restorative (item 6); three assessing daily impairment associated to insomnia symptoms (7 to 9); two assessing the use of prescribed and/or homemade medication (10 and 11); three excluding that sleep difficulties were not due to another sleep disorder, substance use, a physical condition or a mental disorder) (12 to 14).

Results

The IAS Kuder-Richardson alpha was very good (α=0.85) and none of the items increased the alpha if removed. A principal component analysis revealed a three factors solution, explaining a variance/EV of 63,74%: F1/Insomnia symptoms (items 1 to 6) (EV 36.02%; α=0.81); F2/Daily impairment associated to insomnia symptoms (items 7 to 9) (EV 18.67%; α=0.79); F3/Differential diagnosis (items 12 to 14) (EV 8.38%; α=0.81).

Conclusions

The IAS adapted for Portuguese pregnant women presented good reliability and validity.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW587
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.