Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:15:59.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

DV Sheehan ,
Y Lecrubier ,
K Harnett Sheehan ,
J Janavs ,
E Weiller ,
A Keskiner ,
J Schinka ,
E Knapp ,
MF Sheehan  and
GC Dunbar
DV Sheehan
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
Y Lecrubier
Affiliation:
INSERM U302, Hôpital de la Salpätrière. 7 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651Paris Cedex 13, France
K Harnett Sheehan
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
J Janavs
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
E Weiller
Affiliation:
INSERM U302, Hôpital de la Salpätrière. 7 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651Paris Cedex 13, France
A Keskiner
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
J Schinka
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
E Knapp
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
MF Sheehan
Affiliation:
University of South Florida College of Medicine, 3515 E Fletcher Avenue, Tampa, Florida33613, USA
GC Dunbar*
Affiliation:
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Reigate, Surrey, UK
*
*Current affiliation: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT, USA.
Get access

Summary

The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) is a short diagnostic structured interview, developed in clinician (MINI-CR) and patient-rated (MINI-PR) formats, for 17 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R Axis I psychiatric disorders. This study, which investigates the validity of the MINI in relation to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Patients (SCID-P), was conducted in conjunction with a similar study, investigating the validity of the MINI in relation to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for International Statistical Classification of Disease (ICD)-10. Both studies also examined the inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the MINI. Three hundred and seventy subjects (330 in Florida and 40 in Paris) participated in the validation of the MINI versus the SCID-P. Of these, 308 had at least one psychiatric disorder and 62 were non-patient adult controls. Eighty of the subjects (40 in Florida and 40 in Paris) also participated in the parallel study of the validity of the MINI versus the CIDI. The 330 Florida subjects first completed the patient-rated version of the MINI. All subjects were administered the MINI-CR (after the MINI-PR in the case of the Florida subjects), followed by the SCID-P. The MINI-CR was rated by two interviewers for 42 subjects in Florida and 42 in Paris (inter-rater reliability test) and readministered by a third blind interviewer one to two days after the initial rating (test-retest reliability test). Overall, the results supported the validity and reliability of the MINI. In addition, administration of the MINI-CR took half as long as administration of corresponding sections of the SCID-P. The application of short structured interviews in clinical and research settings is discussed.

Keywords

MINIstructured diagnostic interviewpsychiatric diagnosisDSM-IIIRDSM-IVpsychiatric comorbility
Type
Original articles
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , 1997 , pp. 232 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadhead, WE, Leon, AC, Weissman, MM, Barret, JE, et al.. Development and validation of the SDDS-PC screen for multiple mental disorders in primary care. Arch Fam Med 1995; 4: 211–21910.1001/archfami.4.3.211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. A coeefficient of nominal agreement for nominal scales. Psychol Measurement 1960; 20: 37–4610.1177/001316446002000104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, JLStatistical Methods for Rates and Proportions 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981Google Scholar
Lecrubier, Y, Sheehan, DV, Weiller, E, et al.. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 1997; 5: 224–23110.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrout, PE, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JLQuantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44: 172–17710.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800140084013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW, Gibbon, M, First, MBStructured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ul-R Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Williams, JBW, Kroenke, K, et al. The PRIME-MD 1000 study: validation of a new system for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care Presented at the Seventh Annual NIMH International Research Conference On Mental Health Problems in the General Health Section McLean VASept. 21, 1993 10.1001/jama.272.22.1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization, WHO The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), Authorized Core Version 1.0 Geneva: WHO, 1990Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.