No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Vortioxetine versus citalopram in treating major depressive disorder (MDD)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2020
Abstract
Citalopram is a widely used antidepressant (AD), indicated for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), with a high and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitory action (SSRI), good efficacy and safety profile. Vortioxetine is a novel multimodal antidepressant compound, with a mixed action on Serotonin (both 5-HT agonism and antagonism). Its clinical efficacy has been established in several short and long term trials; furthermore it proved effective at mitigating cognitive dysfunction, which is addressed to as one of the main causes of social impairment in MMD patients.
To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of Vortioxetine versus Citalopram, in patients suffering from MDD.
To assess whether Vortioxetine effectiveness and tolerability are comparable to those observed for previous antidepressants.
The main outcomes were efficacy (variance from baseline to 1 month) in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and tolerability (adverse events). Changes in cognitive performance were assessed using the following specifics tools: Digit symbol substitution test (DSST), Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).
Data collection is ongoing. According to Literature we expect to find a significant number of MDD patients on Vortioxetine to achieve a reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline, to report poor adverse events and to increase their cognitive performance.
As shown by recent literature, Vortioxetine might be an effective option in treating MMD with particular focus on cognitive dysfunction.
The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
- Type
- e-Poster viewing: Cultural psychiatry
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 41 , Issue S1: Abstract of the 25th European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2017 , pp. S540 - S541
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.