Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T08:28:55.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What is commonly missed in the suicidal risk assessments in the emergency room?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

N. Alavi
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Psychiatry, Toronto, Canada
T. Reshetukha
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
E. Prost
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
A. Kristen
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Psychiatry, Kingston, Canada
D. Groll
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Psychiatry, Kingston, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Suicidal behaviour remains the most common reason for presentation to the emergency rooms. In spite of identifiable risk factors, suicide remains essentially unpredictable by current tools and assessments. Moreover, some factors may not be included consistently in the suicidal risk assessments in the emergency room by either emergency medicine physicians or psychiatrists.

Method

Step 1 involved the administration of a survey on the importance of suicide predictors for assessment between psychiatry and emergency medicine specialties. In step 2 a chart review of psychiatric emergency room patients in Kingston, Canada was conducted to determine suicide predictor documentation rates. In step 3, based on the result of the first 2 steps a suicide risk assessment tool (Suicide RAP [Risk Assessment Prompt]) was developed and presented to both teams. A second patient chart review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the educational intervention and suicide RAP in suicide risk assessment.

Results

Significant differences were found in the rating of importance and the documentation rates of suicide predictors between the two specialties. Several predictors deemed important, have low documentation rates. Thirty of the suicide predictors showed increased rates of documentation after the educational intervention and the presentation of the suicide RAP.

Conclusion

Though a surfeit of information regarding patient risk factors for suicide is available, clinicians and mental health professionals face difficulties in integrating and applying this information to individuals. Based on the result of this study suicide RAP and educational intervention could be helpful in improving the suicidal risk assessment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster viewing: Emergency psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.